Metropolitan / State Planning /CPGs

 Metropolitan Planning Program (MPP) funds are available to carry out the transportation planning process and meet the programming requirements of the joint FTA/FHWA planning regulations, "Planning Assistance and Standards," 23 C.F.R. Part 450 and 49 C.F.R. Part 613. FTA apportions MPP funds to the States based on a set of formulas: 80% of the funds available is apportioned according to an urbanized area population based formula; the remaining 20% is provided to the states based on an FTA administrative formula to address planning needs in larger, more complex urbanized areas with one million or more population. Acting as the FTA grantees, the States distribute these funds to each urbanized area, or portion of an urbanized area, within the state according to a formula developed by the State and approved by FTA. These "in-state" formulas have been or will be affirmed or revised to address changes resulting from the 2000 Census population data.

The MPP provides financial assistance, through the states, to Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to support the costs of preparing long-range transportation plans and financially-feasible TIPs, required as a condition of obtaining Federal Capital Program and Urbanized Area Formula Program grants for transit projects. In addition to providing funding for local and state transportation planning and objectives, the MPP provides a means of drawing state and local attention to national priorities through a series of periodically issued Planning Emphasis Areas (PEA). A planning emphasis area is established by FTA and FHWA to advance national goals as established by Federal law, to reflect FTA and FHWA priorities, and to respond to congressional direction established through the appropriations process.

In FY 2002, FTA obligated more than $55 million for metropolitan planning. Of this total, almost $39 million was obligated under the standard formula program (5303) (Table 47). Almost $17 million in additional MPP funds were obligated through consolidated grants.


The State Planning and Research Program (SP&R) is a source of Federal financial assistance to the States to meet the planning requirements of the joint FTA/FHWA planning regulations, "Planning Assistance and Standards," 23 C.F.R. Part 450 and 49 C.F.R. Part 613. As with the MPP, the State is the FTA grantee for this program. The SP&R funds may be used for a variety of purposes and programs in addition to its function as a source of financial support for state transportation planning activities. These other programs include: Research, Development, and Demonstration (49 U.S.C. §5312(a)); Training (49 U.S.C. §5312(c); Research and Training in Urban Transportation Problems (49 U.S.C. §§5312(a), 5317(a)); Human Resource (49 U.S.C. §5322); as well as for Metropolitan Planning (49 U.S.C. §5303).

In FY 2002, FTA obligated more than $11 million for state planning and research. Of this total, over $9 million was obligated under the standard formula program (5313(b)) (Table 47). An additional $2.4 million in SP&R funds were obligated through consolidated planning grants.

For additional information on the planning programs, contact Candace Noonan, Office of Planning, TPL-11, at (202) 366-1648.


In fiscal year 1997, FTA and FHWA began offering states the option of participating in a pilot

Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG) program. FTA and FHWA have now made CPG a permanent pilot. Since the first CPG grant was awarded in April 1997, almost $310 million has been obligated by the pilot states. Of this total, more than $238 million is from FHWA sources. Of the 12 state pilot participants, three have used annual grants only; three have a mixture of grant lengths, starting with annual and switching to multi-year grants or vice versa; and five have used only multi-year grants with the grant period ranging up to three years. Those with the multi-year grants can close them at any time and begin the next year with either a new multi-year grant or an annual grant. The ease with which a state can opt for the single year or the multi-year approach to the CPG grant is just one example of the flexibility intended for the pilot.

Under the CPG, states can report metropolitan planning expenditures (to comply with the Single Audit Act) for both FTA and FHWA under the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance number for FTA's Metropolitan Planning Program. Additionally, for states with an FHWA Metropolitan Planning (PL) fund matching ratio greater than 80 percent, the state (through FTA) can request a waiver of FTA’s 20 percent local share requirement in order that all FTA funds used for metropolitan planning in a CPG can be granted at the higher, FHWA rate. For some states, this Federal match rate can exceed 90 percent. Currently, three western states participating in the pilot are using the FHWA PL match rate. Pre-award authority has been granted to both of FTA's planning programs for the life of TEA-21 (through FY 2003). This pre-award authority enables states to continue planning program activities from year to year with the assurance that eligible costs can later be converted to a regularly funded Federal project without the need for prior approval or authorization from the granting agency. Beginning in FY 2000, the transfer provision in TEA-21 (Section 1103(i)"Transfer of Highway and Transit Funds") has been applied to FHWA funds used in the CPG.

State FTA Funds Obligated FHWA Funds Obligated Total Funds Obligated
Arkansas 281,145 977,550 1,258,695
California 11,262,727 30,891,954 42,154,681
Colorado 724,233 2,805,287 3,529,520
Idaho 308,249 977,550 1,285,799
Iowa 222,652 1,730,517 1,953,169
Kansas 288,755 1,201,721 1,490,476
Maryland 1,541,609 4,225,310 5,766,919
Minnesota 911,598 2,763,094 3,674,692
North Dakota 310,678 1,486,500 1,797,178
Ohio 2,381,647 7,379,525 9,761,172
Washington 991,575 3,792,611 4,784,186
Wyoming 426,049 661,139 1,087,188
Totals $19,650,917 $58,892,758 $78,543,675