Answer: Yes, FTA will extend pre-award authority to economic recovery program funds consistent with the program requirements of the applicable FTA program. ARRA funds administered under the requirements of Section 5307, Section 5311, or Fixed Guideway Modernization will have blanket pre-award authority from October 1, 2008, until September 30, 2010. There are two exceptions: the energy savings and tribal transit projects will have pre-award authority from the date that project selections are announced in the Federal Register. Economic recovery funds administered in accordance with the requirements of the Section 5309 Capital Investment Grant program (New/Small Starts) will have pre-award authority only for the stage approved up to that point. For example, upon approval to enter preliminary engineering, the grantee has pre-award authority to incur preliminary engineering costs. For more information, refer to the FY 2009 Apportionments Notice published in the Federal Register, December 18, 2008.
Answer: No local match is required except for the Capital Investment Grant Program.
Answer: No. Some areas do not meet the standard required to be included in the apportionment calculations under the Fixed Guideway Modernization (FGM) tiers for which ARRA funds are available. The $750 million in FGM funds under ARRA is not sufficient to fund all tiers of the FGM formula. The allotment of the funds to the tiers, in accordance with Section 5337, results in full funding of tiers 1, 2, and 3, and partial funding of tier 4, in the amount of $169,100,000. FTA is not permitted to pro-rate the $750 million over all of the FGM formula tiers. The first tier allocates specific amounts to designated areas. Funds allotted to tiers 2, 3, and 4 are apportioned using the 1997 standard.
If an area did not receive an FGM apportionment in 1997, it did not meet the 1997 standard and, thus, it is not eligible to be apportioned funds under tiers 2-4, unless that law specifies otherwise.
Answer: No. However, FTA grantees are strongly encouraged to use the two logos unveiled on March 3, 2009, by President Obama that were designed to identify all Recovery Act projects approved and funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation. The first logo represents Recovery.Gov and for purposes of transparency and accountability will be used government wide to show the public where their tax dollars are working to promote economic recovery and reinvestment in the nation’s infrastructure. The second logo is specific to the US DOT and includes the word TIGER, which stands for Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery. FTA has made available high resolution images suitable for reproduction for grantees to download to produce signs or decals to display on FTA funded ARRA projects.
FTA strongly encourages grantees to prominently display both logos described above on all projects funded by the ARRA. Given the wide variability of transit projects, FTA does not specify a particular size or format of sign, but provides the following guidelines:
However, it is important that costs associated with signage are reasonable and limited. Signs should not be produced or displayed if doing so results in unreasonable cost or expense. OMB provides the following guidance on ARRA signage:
Q: Is there an Administration policy regarding Recovery Act signage?
A: The Administration believes that signage is one of several ways to provide the public with full notice of how its tax dollars are being spent and advance the Recovery Act’s goals of openness and transparency. However, it is important that costs associated with signage are reasonable and limited. Signs should not be produced or displayed if doing so results in unreasonable cost or expense.
Guidance therefore intends to encourage—but does not require—the use of signage where appropriate and in furtherance of openness and transparency. While guidance provides that “(a)ll projects which are funded by the ARRA should display signage that features the Primary Emblem throughout the construction phase” it also states that “exclusions may apply.” Specific requirements regarding usage of signage are handled on an agency-by-agency basis.
In the event that signage is used, please refer to the following guidance.
Answer: Electronic copies are available to grantees on this website at http://www.fta.dot.gov/index_9440_9909.html. Both logos are available in two electronic formats:
Answer: There are no new or additional Title VI requirements. Title VI program requirements are not waived with ARRA.
Answer: Yes, the statute has information on Surety Guarantee Revolving Funds.
Answer: Following issuance of interim guidance and notice of funding availability, the Department announced final project selections on February 17, 2010. The announcement may be viewed at http://www.dot.gov/documents/finaltigergrantinfo.pdf.
Answer: Pre-award authority allows grantees to incur project costs prior to grant approval and retain the eligibility of those costs for subsequent reimbursement after grant approval. Grants could not be approved prior to March 5, 2009 when funding availability was announced in the Federal Register. In the March 5 Federal Register Notice, FTA extended blanket pre-award authority beginning October 1, 2008, for ARRA program funds that are distributed by formula, to facilitate early expenditure of the ARRA funds to achieve the purposes of the Act. Costs incurred before that date are not eligible for reimbursement. Prior to incurring costs, all Federal requirements such as NEPA and STIP approval must have been met.
Answer: All areas obligated 50 percent of the funds apportioned to them before the September 1 deadline; therefore no funds were made available for reallocation. The balance of the initial apportionment was obligated by March 5, 2010, the final deadline. Thus, no funds were available for redistribution.
Answer: All areas obligated 50 percent of the funds apportioned to them before the September 1 deadline; therefore no funds were made available for reallocation. The balance of the initial apportionment was obligated by March 5, 2010, the final deadline. Thus no funds were available for redistribution.