Top of Page
U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration
PURPOSE. The purpose of this circular is to provide guidelines and management procedures for Metropolitan Planning grants, Capital Program grants and Urbanized Area Formula grants for assistance programs of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), after award. Guidance is provided which covers Grant Administration and Management in Chapter I, Real Property and Equipment Issues in Chapter II, Financial Management in Chapter III, and Payment Procedures in Chapter IV.
Grant management guidelines for the Elderly and Persons With Disabilities Program are contained in FTA Circular 9070.1E, and grant management guidelines for Other Than Urbanized Areas Program are contained in FTA Circular 9040.1E.
CANCELLATION. This circular cancels FTA Circular 5010.1B, "Grant Management Guidelines, dated 9-7-95.
EXPLANATION OF CHANGE. This circular incorporates the Federal transit laws as codified in 49 United States Code, chapter 53. The major changes in this circular are in the new chapter II, for management of real and personal property. This change was made to better meet customer needs. This chapter includes a comprehensive list of disposition options for real property, equipment and supplies including the new TEA-21 provision, 49 U.S.C. 5334(g)(4).
BACKGROUND. This revised circular updates the general grant management procedures applicable to FTA grantees that receive Federal funds under 49 U.S.C., chapter 53. The revisions are consistent with the current provisions of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21), as amended, and other applicable statutes, OMB guidelines and DOT policy and regulations.
These procedures are intended to assist grantees in administering FTA-funded projects and in meeting grant responsibilities and reporting requirements. More specific guidance regarding certain subjects, such as civil rights or cost principles, is provided in the above-referenced documents, which deal more specifically with individual topics. Grantees are reminded of their responsibility to comply with regulatory requirements and should be aware of all pertinent material to assist in the management of federally assisted grants.
WAIVERS. To the extent permitted by law, the Federal Transit Administrator reserves the right to waive any provision of this circular.
Gordon J. Linton
Top of Page
|U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration
400 Seventh St. S.W.
As you know, many changes have occurred in the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) over the past several years. Consequently, FTA guidance circulars have become outdated and in need of revision. I am happy to provide to you a revision of FTA's Grant Management Guidelines Circular 5010.1C, dated October 1, 1998.
This circular has been updated to include a separate chapter II for real property and equipment acquisition, management, and disposition issues. One of the changes, enacted by the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21), allows the grantee to retain sales proceeds from excess assets to help reduce the gross project cost of subsequent capital projects.
In FY 1999, FTA will begin using its new Transportation Electronic Award and Management (TEAM) system for grant award and management. The system uses graphic user technology, providing point and click "smart" selections that will aid grant recipients in the process of submitting applications and reporting on the management of their grants.
I hope you will find many benefits to assist you in the management of your FTA transit grant programs. I urge you to become familiar with the changes as this circular is now the operational document for FTA program management. You also have my personal assurance that in the months ahead FTA will continue its efforts to assist you in the management of your transit grants in the most business-like manner possible.
Gordon J. Linton
Top of Page
GENERAL. This circular describes the process and provides guidelines and procedures for management of FTA grants at 49 U.S.C. chapter 53, sections:
5309 Capital Program;
5303 Metropolitan Planning;
5307 Urbanized Area Formula Program;
5313(b) State/Planning and Research.
Procedures for management of 49 U.S.C. Section 5310, the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Program grants, are provided in the current version of FTA Circular 9070.1E, and procedures for management of 49 U.S.C. Section 5311, Nonurbanized Areas Formula Program grants, are provided in the current version of FTA Circular 9040.1E. FTA follows the Common Rule (49 C.F.R. Part 18) for project management for those programs that have states as grantees, including Sections 5310, 5311, and 5313(b).
Agencies that receive FTA assistance are defined as "grantees." The term "projects" refers to public transit improvement activities funded under an executed grant. Similarly, "projects" refer to locally developed groups or lists of projects as presented in the Transportation Improvement Program or State Transportation Improvement Program (TIP/STIP) and to FTA, as approved and defined in executed agreements, referred to herein as "program."
FTA Regional Offices retain responsibility for management oversight of most grant projects. References in this circular to the cognizant agency mean the FTA Regional Office unless otherwise defined.
GRANTEE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR GRANT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT. The grantee is responsible for administration and management of the grant in compliance with the grant agreement and applicable FTA circulars and regulations. The grantee is also responsible for funds that "pass through" to a subrecipient. Grantees may revise budgets in ways that do not change the scope of a grant. Procedures for changes to an approved grant are discussed later in this chapter. FTA monitors grants to confirm that grantees establish and follow procedures that are reasonable and comply with FTA requirements. Submission of Annual Certifications and Assurances stand in lieu of detailed FTA scrutiny. Annual independent audits for recipients of urbanized area formula program funds and triennial reviews give FTA an opportunity to verify the grantee's certifications and assurances. The grantee's responsibilities include actions that:
CIVIL RIGHTS REQUIREMENTS.
All required civil rights program submissions must be approved by FTA and periodically updated in accordance with program guidelines.
These nondiscrimination provision and associated affirmative action obligations apply to employment and business opportunities and are in addition to the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The grantee must annually signify compliance with the above civil rights requirements through the Annual Certifications and Assurances.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. The purpose of a grant is defined by the budget at the time of grant approval and is formalized in the Grant Agreement. FTA monitors grant activities to ensure proper grantee stewardship of Federal funds and compliance with the laws and regulations that govern its grant programs. FTA must also be able to report on program results, industry trends and its own oversight responsibilities. The information FTA needs for program forecasting, management and reporting is furnished through narrative milestone/progress reports submitted by grantees about significant events, relevant grant activities and any changes to or variances in the grant schedule or budget.
With respect to the level of detail required for these reports, FTA treats all approved activity line items alike. Thus, an activity contained in a Capital Program grant (49 U.S.C. Section 5309), and a project contained in an Urbanized Area Formula Program grant (49 U.S.C. Section 5307), must be presented in the reports in sufficient detail that important information is not lost in aggregation. For example, the number of full-sized buses in a grant must not be reported together with vans and supervisory automobiles under the heading "rolling stock." FTA staff are available to meet with grantees soon after grant approval to mutually agree on an appropriate level of reporting detail. This will assure that FTA has the information needed to manage its overall program and to respond fully to specific requests from Congressional committees, auditors and the general public.
Report Due Dates. Urbanized area formula and capital program financial status reports (FSR) and milestone/progress reports are due to FTA within 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter, i.e., by January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30. All state recipients of planning assistance are required to submit their reports annually. In individual cases, FTA may grant extensions of report due dates. Payments may be withheld when reports are not submitted as agreed.
Submission of FSRs and milestone/progress reports for grants in FTA's non-urbanized area formula, elderly and persons with disabilities, metropolitan planning, and state planning and research programs are due annually for the period ending September 30 each year. FTA may request more frequent reporting when circumstances warrant.
GRANT MODIFICATIONS. A grant obligates the grantee to undertake and complete activities defined by the scope and budget as incorporated in the grant agreement. The grant budget, as used in this circular, means the approved financial plan that FTA and the grantee agree will be followed in carrying out the purposes of the grant. During the course of the program or project, it may be necessary to modify the grant by revising the budget or amending the grant agreement. For example, modifications may be required because of changes in the purpose, description, terms and conditions, or an increase in the cost of an approved grant.
Lapsed Funds. It is important to note that the authority to obligate program funds lapses, i.e., ceases to be available, at the end of the funds' period of availability. After the year of availability, any lapsed funds already approved in a grant can only be used for the purpose for which the funds were approved. Proposed changes in the scope of a grant cannot be done with lapsed funds, however, budget revisions are still allowable. If all activities in the approved grant have been completed, and there are lapsing funds that are unobligated by the grantee, these funds should be deobligated by FTA. Because of the potential for severe penalties for anti-deficiency violations, grantees must exercise careful judgment in determining changes to their grants. A grantee should periodically review the funding approved in their grants and its availability. The year of funding can be found on the last page in the approved project budget under the accounting classification.
Planning and capital grant changes are summarized in Exhibit I-1, at the end of this chapter. The table provides an overview of the relationship between budget revisions, administrative amendments and grant amendments as described in the text.
General. The approved grant budget is sent to the grantee electronically following FTA approval of the grant. The grantee is responsible for controlling and monitoring all grant activities to ensure that they are carried out in accordance with the approved budget, including control of individual projects within the grant.
Beyond assuring that grantees' budget revisions will not change the amount or scope of a grant, the grantee may change the dollar amount to be spent to procure or construct items under an individual activity item. FTA monitors grants to confirm that grantees establish and follow procedures that are reasonable and comply with FTA requirements. Grant changes may be made by budget revision if the purpose, scope and amount of the grant will remain unchanged.
Prior Approval. Grantees must obtain prior FTA approval electronically for the following proposed budget revisions.
Modify Terms. An administrative amendment cannot be used to change the scope of a grant. An administrative amendment may be used to change or clarify the terms, conditions or provisions of a grant contract. These usually are initiated by FTA and may be used only when no change will result in the scope, amount or purpose of the grant. An administrative amendment is used to modify a grant contract for such purposes as to comply with changes required by FTA law, to change the year or type of funds obligated for a grant, to transfer equipment from one grantee to another, to reflect a change in the grantee's name, or to deobligate Federal funds that are not needed to complete approved project scope or purpose.
Operating Period Changes. An administrative amendment may be used to institute time period changes, adjustments or extensions to time of operating period provided the total amount of Federal funds previously awarded under the grant remains unchanged. The grantee may enter a change in electronic text with a brief explanation. This allows sufficient flexibility to encompass potential time adjustments, and allows the FTA office sufficient time to review.
If a time period is part of the grant agreement, the grantee may request a time change in a brief letter for approval by the Regional Administrator. This is then retained for potential auditor review. The alternate option is to specify a longer time period in the original grant to encompass any potential time adjustments that may become necessary or do not specify a finite time period, [e.g., "for the next operating period"] which provides maximum flexibility.
A grant amendment is required when proposed changes in the grant would:
Requirements. Grant amendments are subject to the same application requirements as a new grant request. Issuance of a revised grant agreement and budget is required for an amendment and, because a change in scope or funding of the grant results, a change in the previous obligation of funds is also required. FTA can reobligate funds only if the previously obligated funds have not lapsed.
Procedures. An amendment must be used for grant changes that cannot be handled by a budget revision or administrative amendment. Amendments require the issuance of a revised grant agreement and budget, and may require a change in the amount of funds obligated for the grant. A deobligation and reobligation of funds to accompany a change in project scope can occur only if the previously obligated funds have not lapsed, or if new funds are available.
An amendment is subject to the same requirements as a new grant request except that the grantee need not resubmit portions of the original grant application which are unaffected by the change. The grantee must submit a detailed description of the changes, a revised project budget and if applicable, an SF-424 form if there are changes in funding levels. These changes may be accomplished electronically.
Change of Scope. The scope of a grant is changed by the following.
Funds Reobligation. To effect a change in scope of a formula grant, the Federal funds previously approved must not have lapsed and the obligation of Federal funds must be changed as follows.
Scope Reduction. If the scope of a grant is reduced or the cost of the original scope decreases, the funds obligated to it must be reduced accordingly unless offsetting cost increases are approved by FTA.
Activity Replacement. If a grant is changed to replace some activities by others within a scope, funds must be adjusted to reflect the change.
Increase in the Project Amount. If the scope of a grant increases or the costs of the original scope increases and additional Federal funds are required, new funds may be obligated to the project.
General. Third party contracts are entered into by the grantee for procurement of supplies, equipment, construction, and other services required to implement a grant project. Grantees must follow certain procedures to ensure that these materials and services are obtained in free and open competition, prices are fair and reasonable, and are in compliance with the provisions of applicable Federal, State and local laws. This includes affording procurement opportunities to small and disadvantaged business enterprises.
For information on specific third party contracting standards, see FTA Circular 4220.1D, dated April 15, 1996, entitled "Third Party Contracting Guidelines," and FTA Circular 4716.1A, entitled "FTA Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Requirements for Recipients and Transit Vehicle Manufacturers." Inter-agency agreements passing through grant funds to other public bodies (including transit operators) are not third-party contracts. The pass-through grantee must comply with FTA Circular 4220.1D (or subsequent revision), if it enters into any subsequent third-party contracts using FTA grant funds.
Claims and Change Orders. FTA will not substitute its judgment for that of the grantee or subgrantee unless the matter is primarily a Federal concern. Grantees and subgrantees alone will be responsible, in accordance with good administrative practice and sound business judgment, for the settlement of all contractual and administrative issues arising out of procurements. These issues include, but are not limited to, source evaluation, protests, disputes, and claims. These standards do not relieve the grantee or subgrantee of any contractual responsibilities under its contracts.
Interest and Rights. Consistent with provisions of the grant agreement, third party contractor claims are to be evaluated and resolved by the grantee pursuant to the following considerations, requirements and limits.
If the grantee's claim records substantiate that reasonable and prudent measures were taken to prevent or offset the causes underlying the claim, FTA may participate in the negotiated cost. Subject to availability of funds, FTA can fund a prorated share of the properly incurred, eligible costs of contractor claims that are not caused by mismanagement on the part of the grantee or attributable to the contractor.
It is recommended that grant applicants specify the expected service life category in requests for bids when acquiring new vehicles.
FTA calculates the value of vehicles prior to the end of their minimum normal service life on the basis of a formula using straight-line depreciation as described in paragraph (2)(b) below. Removal of an FTA-funded vehicle from revenue service before the end of its minimum normal service life, except for reasons of fire, collision, or natural disaster, leaves the grantee liable to FTA for the Federal share of the vehicle's remaining value. Consistent with this policy, the suggested vehicle service life standards stated above in years refer to time in normal service, not time spent stockpiled or otherwise unavailable for regular transit duty.
Replacement Policies. (Also see Chapter II of this circular for equipment disposition.)
To determine the Federal interest in a federally funded vehicle during its minimum normal service life, a straight-line depreciation formula is used: for example, for a bus with a 12-year minimum normal service life, the bus's value decreases each year by 1/12 of its original purchase price. Similarly, the Federal interest in the bus decreases each year by 1/12 of the amount of the Federal grant that was awarded for its purchase.
Grant applicants interested in buying a replacement vehicle before the end of the minimum normal service life of the vehicle to be replaced should refer to the FTA Notice, "Change in Policy on Sale and Replacement of Transit Vehicles," published in the
Depending upon the extent of rebuilding planned, it may be subject to Americans with Disabilities Act requirements. Rebuilding is also an eligible capital cost under the category of preventive maintenance.
For purposes of the spare ratio calculation, "vehicles operated in maximum service" is defined as the total number of revenue vehicles operated to meet the annual maximum service requirement. This is the revenue vehicle count during the peak season of the year, on the week and day that maximum service is provided. It excludes atypical days and one-time special events. Scheduled standby vehicles are permitted to be included as "vehicles operated in maximum service."
Spare ratio is defined as the number of spare vehicles divided by the vehicles required for annual maximum service. Spare ratio is usually expressed as a percentage, e.g., 100 vehicles required and 20 spare vehicles is a 20 percent spare ratio.
For each grant application to acquire vehicles, a grant applicant must address the subjects of current spare ratio, the spare ratio anticipated at the time the new vehicles are introduced into service, disposition of vehicles to be replaced, and the applicant's conformance with the FTA spare ratio guideline. An applicant is required to notify FTA if the spare ratio computation on which the grant application is based is significantly altered prior to the grant award. A fleet status report must be submitted with each grant application to acquire rolling stock.
When a grantee removes a vehicle financed by FTA from service before expiration of its minimum normal service life--except for reasons of fire, collision, or natural disaster-- the grantee is legally obligated to FTA for an amount equal to the Federal share of the vehicle's remaining value, as explained further below. The value of a vehicle prior to the end of its minimum normal service life is calculated on the basis of straight-line depreciation.
Replacement at End of Minimum Normal Service Life. Before a grantee may replace an old rail vehicle with a new rail vehicle, the old vehicle must have reached or exceeded its 25-year minimum normal service life. For purposes of a rail vehicle replacement project, the age of the vehicle to be replaced is its age at the time the new vehicle is introduced into service. FTA's 25-year service life requirement is a minimum standard.
Early Disposition. If a vehicle is replaced before the end of its minimum normal service life, the grant applicant has the option of returning to FTA an amount equal to the remaining Federal interest in the vehicle or using FTA's "Like Kind Exchange" policy and putting an amount equal to the remaining Federal interest in the vehicle into a newly purchased vehicle.
To determine the Federal interest remaining in a federally financed rail vehicle, one must first calculate the total value remaining in the vehicle using the straight-line depreciation method. Based on straight-line depreciation, the value of a rail vehicle with a 25-year minimum normal service life decreases by 1/25 of the purchase price for each year the vehicle has been in transit service. Thus, a rail vehicle in service for 20 years has a total remaining value of 5/25 or 1/5 of the original purchase price. Having calculated the total remaining value, one then multiplies that figure by the percentage of Federal assistance that was provided to purchase the vehicle. The product of this multiplication represents the Federal interest remaining in the vehicle.
Use of Like-Kind Exchange. A vehicle may be traded-in or sold before the end of its minimum normal service life, if a grantee so chooses. Moreover, a grantee may elect to use the trade-in value or the sales proceeds from the vehicle to acquire a replacement vehicle of like kind. "Like-Kind" means a bus for a bus with a similar service life and a rail vehicle for a rail vehicle. Under the Like-Kind Exchange policy, proceeds from the vehicle sales are not returned to the FTA; instead, all proceeds must be invested in acquisition of the like-kind replacement vehicles. If sales proceeds are less than the amount of the Federal interest in the vehicle to be replaced, the grantee is responsible for providing the difference, along with the grantee's local share of the cost of the replacement vehicle. If sales proceeds are equal to or greater than the amount of the Federal interest, all the proceeds also must be used to purchase the like-kind replacement vehicle, and the reinvestment amounts to a lowering of the gross project cost. Grant applicants interested in buying a replacement vehicle before the end of the minimum normal service life of the vehicle to be replaced should refer to the FTA Federal Register Notice, "Change in Policy on Sale and Replacement of Transit Vehicles," 57 Fed. Reg., 39328, August 28, 1992.
Rebuilding. Any rail vehicle that will be rebuilt must have an accumulated service life of at least 12 years (mid-life rebuild) or must have reached the end of its minimum normal service life (end-of-life rebuild). The eligibility of this major capital rail rebuild work is in addition to the eligibility for vehicle overhauls (paragraph c below). The rebuilding is also eligible as preventive maintenance.
Spare Ratio. Because rail transit operations tend to be highly individualized, FTA has not established a specific number to serve as an acceptable spare ratio for rail transit operations. Nevertheless, rail operators should be aware that the grant applicant's rail vehicle spare ratio and the rationale underlying that spare ratio will be examined as part of the grant application review whenever FTA assistance is requested to purchase rail vehicles, and during the triennial review. A fleet status report must be submitted with any grant application for assistance to acquire rolling stock. As in the calculation of spare ratio for bus fleets, scheduled standby fixed guideway vehicles are permitted to be included as "vehicles operated in maximum service."
The following guidance should be used to support an operator's proposed spare ratio when the spare ratio is under review by FTA:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
Buy America Requirements. The grant applicant must certify that in carrying out a procurement authorized for the Urbanized Area Formula Program the applicant will comply with applicable Buy America laws (49 U.S.C. Section 5307(d)(1)(E)). (See Category XII, in Annual Certifications and Assurances.) In accordance with 49 U.S.C. Section 5323(j), and FTA Buy America regulations, 49 CFR. Part 661, specific Buy America requirements apply to each acquisition of iron, steel, or manufactured goods, including rolling stock. Unless an acquisition qualifies for a waiver as discussed further in this section, Federal transit assistance authorized by 49 U.S.C. chapter 53 and 23 U.S.C. (Highways) may not be used to finance the acquisition of iron, steel, or manufactured goods that are not produced in the United States.
Environmental Mitigation. The National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321) and the FTA's implementing procedures (23 CFR Part 771) require that the environmental effects of proposed transit projects be documented and that environmental protection be considered before a decision can be made to proceed with a project. Where adverse environmental effects are likely to result, 49 U.S.C. Section 5324(b) Economic, Social and Environmental Interests, require that alternatives be considered to avoid those effects. If there is no feasible and prudent alternative which avoids the adverse environmental effects, then all reasonable steps must be taken to minimize those effects.
Measures to avoid or mitigate environmental harm are described in the environmental documents prepared for projects. These measures have been developed jointly by FTA and the grantee to respond to State and local as well as Federal environmental requirements. The mitigation measures in final environmental documents are expressed as commitments on the part of the grantee which will be implemented if the project receives Federal funding. When a grant is made, the mitigation measures are incorporated by reference in the grant agreement for construction and become legally binding terms and conditions of the grant which cannot be withdrawn or substantively changed without FTA's approval.
The progress in implementing adopted mitigation measures is monitored by FTA regional staff through periodic project reviews, on-site inspections and special meetings when necessary. The grantee has the responsibility to apprise FTA at the earliest possible time of any problems in implementing the adopted measures and any need for changes. Where mitigation options are being considered, FTA will maintain a role in the decision making process to ensure continuing compliance with DOT regulation 23 CFR Part 771 implementing Environmental Impact & Related Procedures, and 49 U.S.C. Section 5324 (b) Economic, Social and Environmental Interests.
Information about FTA's environmental protection process is available through the FTA regional office.
Project Management Plan. A written plan is required by 49 U.S.C. Section 5327. Grantees develop and implement a project management plan for all major capital projects funded by FTA as part of the Project Management Oversight Program. This plan covers a grantee's detailed project management strategy to control the project budget, schedule and quality. (See paragraph Design and Construction for definition of major capital project.)
As a general rule, if the project meets the definition of major capital project, the grantee must submit the project management plan during the grant application review process. If FTA determines the project is major after the grant has been approved, FTA will inform the grantee of its determination and will require submission of the plan within 90 days. (See 49 CFR Part 663, dated 9-1-89.)
General. The construction of transit systems may require the relocation and/or rearrangement of privately and publicly owned utilities. These utilities include, but are not limited to systems and physical plant for producing, transmitting or distributing communications, electricity, gas, oil, crude oil products, water, steam, waste storm water, or other substances; publicly owned fire and police signal systems; and railroads and streets which directly or indirectly serve the public or any part thereof. Relocating and/or rearranging utilities and facilities necessary to accommodate an FTA-funded transit system may be considered an eligible expense as part of an FTA-funded project. Exceptions to this include those situations where State and local law expressly prohibit the financing of such by the public entity.
Eligibility for FTA Funding. In order to qualify for FTA funding, the grantee must execute an agreement for relocating or rearranging facilities with the entity responsible for the facilities prescribing the procedures for the relocation and/or rearrangement of the facilities for the purpose of accommodating the construction of the FTA funded project. Prior FTA approval is not required in reaching a utility relocation agreement.
Utility Relocation Agreement. These agreements are distinguishable from third party contracts in that:
Only actual allowable, allocable, and reasonable costs are reimbursable. Where the work is to be performed by the public utility's forces, no profit is allowed; and
Reimbursement is limited to the amount necessary to relocate and/or rearrange the facilities to effect a condition equal to the existing utility facilities. Generally, reimbursement would not provide for greater capacity, capability, durability, efficiency or function, or other betterments, except for meeting current state and local codes. Indirect costs of governmental entities incurred under a utility relocation agreement are eligible for FTA reimbursement only in accordance with an approved Cost Allocation Plan as prescribed in OMB Circular A-87.
Force Account. Force account is work other than grant or project administration that is included in an approved grant and performed by a grantee's own labor forces. Force account work may consist of design, construction, refurbishment, and inspection, and construction management activities, if eligible for reimbursement under the grant. (See paragraph 14b below.) Incremental labor costs from flagging protection, service diversions or other activities directly related to the capital grant may also be defined as force account work. Force account work does not include grant or project administration activities which are otherwise direct project costs. Force account also does not include work on rolling stock which is not a major capital project.
One of four conditions may warrant the use of a grantee's own labor forces. These are cost savings, exclusive expertise, safety and efficiency of operations, and union agreement.
FTA prior review of a force account plan and justification are required where the total estimated cost of force account work to be performed under the grant is greater than $10,000,000. When work to be performed is less than $10,000,000 but over $100,000, a force account plan is required to be in the grantee's file, but does not require prior FTA approval. When work to be performed using force account is less than $100,000 a detailed plan is not required.
Basis for Reimbursement. Reimbursement for force account work is subject to the grantee providing the following:
Base the present value calculation on the midpoint of construction; and if the time for completion of the work differs for force account and a private sector contract, include an estimate of the cost of not using the completed improvement in the present worth calculation. For example, if the work is to replace leased facilities, the cost of continuing the lease until the work is complete should be taken into account in the cost estimate for each option considered.
Safety considerations may be addressed by a statement of the transit operator's safety officer that performing the work with private sector contractors would have an adverse effect on public safety. Efficiency concerns may be addressed by a present worth calculation, including an estimate of the value of lost transit operation efficiency.
Special care must be taken to ensure that requirements of OMB Circular A-87 are followed, especially for charging expendable property to force account projects and making sure that allowable costs are assigned to the correct activity codes.
Most general purpose equipment and tools can be used in force account work and thereby benefit more than one project. Therefore, the cost of these items normally should not be treated as a direct charge to the project. However, an appropriate use or depreciation charge is an allowable indirect cost if otherwise provided for in the project budget. Unusual circumstances may call for purchase of specialized equipment that is unique to the force account work that is being performed. If such equipment is required, prior FTA approval must be obtained. The usual FTA equipment disposition requirements apply.
The progress and status of force account activities should be separately discussed in milestone/project reports, with emphasis on schedule and budget.
Seismic Standards & Reporting. New Federally funded buildings, and additions to existing buildings and bridges, built with Federal assistance must be designed and constructed in accordance with state, local and industry required standards or codes. The applicant is responsible to know before accepting delivery that the building complies with the seismic design and construction requirements and certify through the annual certification and assurance process, as required by 49 CFR, Part 41.
Value Engineering. Value Engineering (VE) is the systematic, multi-disciplined approach designed to optimize the value of each dollar spent. To accomplish this goal, a team of architects/engineers identifies, analyzes and establishes a value for a function of an item or system. The objective of VE is to satisfy the required function at the lowest total costs (capital, operating and maintenance) over the life of a project consistent with the requirements of performance, reliability, maintainability, safety and esthetics.
Timing. VE on a project should be performed early in the design process before major decisions have been completely incorporated into the design, at or near the end of preliminary engineering (PE) or at 30 percent of design. Some large or complex projects may need to conduct two VE studies.
Reporting. VE Report. Grantees with major capital projects are required to submit a VE report to the appropriate FTA Regional Office at the end of each Federal fiscal year indicating the results of their VE efforts. Copies of the VE report form are available in each regional office.
Peer Review. Peer review is a process used by the grantee in the planning, design and implementation of capital projects. The concept of peer review can be applied to any problem or situation where a second opinion can be useful to decision makers. FTA encourages the grantee to confer with other transit operations and maintenance experts in order to benefit from their experiences. It has been used to review rail extensions, new start projects and the planning of a system of bus facilities. It has provided an in-depth critique of rail systems designs at the preliminary and final engineering stages, provided operations and maintenance information with respect to a variety of rail subsystems and validating the process used by a grantees' planning staff to site bus facilities. The purpose of peer review is to improve the performance of the process or product being reviewed. Basically the question asked is "can we do this better?" Although the grantee is encouraged to conduct peer review with all capital projects, in some instances it may be required by FTA.
Crime Prevention Review. Grantees are encouraged to perform crime prevention reviews during the design phase of all FTA funded transit facilities with particular focus on the incorporation and use of crime prevention through environmental design techniques. This review should be carried out as a project intended to improve and increase the safety and security of an existing or planned transit system or facility for both transit patrons and transit employees. The level of the review should complement the project size and scope. Local crime prevention professionals should be included in the review process. Review documentation should remain on file by the grantee and be available for FTA review upon request.
General. Procedures for disposition of proceeds from the sales of FTA-funded assets are set forth below. These apply to all planning and capital grants governed by this circular except for previously approved grants that contain terms and conditions to the contrary.
(See Chapter II of this circular for Real and Personal Property and Equipment disposition.)
Definition. Sales Proceeds are the net proceeds generated by the disposition of excess real property or equipment that was purchased in part with FTA grant funds.
Requirement. When a grantee disposes of equipment with a unit value of more than $5,000, or supplies with an aggregate residual value of more than $5,000, the grantee must remit to FTA the Federal portion of original participation in market value or net sales proceeds, whichever is greater. Real property must be appraised for its market value. This provision does not apply to proceeds from the licensing or leasing of air rights or from other incidental uses of project property, which are treated as program income. (See Chapter II for alternative options for disposition of real property, equipment and supplies.)
Refunds to FTA. Sales proceeds refunded to FTA must be paid in the form of a check or, if over $10,000, must be transmitted to FTA by the electronic funds transfer system. See "Repayment Procedure" in chapter IV of this circular.
Proceeds Retained. Certain proceeds from the sale or other disposition of assets will be retained by the grantee. These include the local share of proceeds from the sale of assets that were funded with Federal assistance, all proceeds from the sale of assets not funded with Federal assistance, and all proceeds from the license or lease of air and subsurface rights generated through incidental use of project real property. Proceeds from the sale of locally financed assets that were replaced under a Federal grant must be retained for mass transit purposes. (Also see Chapter II.3 Equipment for insurance proceeds, and other equipment and real property disposition guidelines.)
PROGRAM INCOME. Program income means gross income received by the grantee or subgrantee directly generated by a grant-supported activity, or earned only as a result of the grant agreement during the grant period, the time between the effective date of the award and the ending date as reflected in the final financial report. The following provisions apply to all FTA planning and capital grants governed by this circular except for approved grants that contain specific terms and conditions to the contrary. (Also see Chapter III regarding Program Income Accountability, and the Common Rule at 49 CFR. part 18.25.)
Definition. Program income is revenue generated directly or indirectly from grant- supported activities (i.e., income generated by grant funds after they have been applied to authorized grant purposes). Program income is a form of mass transit revenue, but excludes sales proceeds, interest earned on advances of Federal funds and revenues generated by activities that are not grant supported. Examples of program income include fare box revenues and income from the licensing or leasing of air rights or from other leases; advertising; concessions; and the sale of planning reports and maps.
General. Program income includes income from fees for services performed, from the use or rental of real or personal property acquired with grant funds, from the sale of commodities or items fabricated under a grant agreement and from payments of principal and interest on loans made with grant funds. Except as otherwise provided in regulations, program income does not include interest on grant funds, rebates, credits, discounts, refunds, etc., and interest earned on any of them.
Reference. FTA's program income policies are governed by 49 CFR, Part 18, the Common Rule, and may differ from OMB Circular A-102 for State and Local Governments. (See FTA circulars 9070.1E and 9040.1E for guidance on state issues of program income.)
Use. Grantees may retain program income so long as it is used only for mass transit purposes. These may include planning, capital or operating expenses. Program income may not be used to refund or reduce the local share of the grant from which it was earned, but may be used for other transit grants.
Political Activities. Chapter 15 of Title 5 of the United States Code (Hatch Act) provides that all State or local agency employees who are engaged in an activity financed by Federal government grants or loans may not be candidates for elective office or use their positions to influence public elections. Furthermore, those State and local agencies receiving Federal assistance are prohibited from coercing their employees into making political contributions. Exceptions to the general Hatch Act prohibition do exist, such as certain non-supervisory transit employees and persons holding elective office. State and local agencies should contact the appropriate FTA Regional Counsel or the FTA Office of Chief Counsel to discuss any questions they may have about the specific applicability of these provisions to their situation.
Copyrights and Rights in Data. When FTA provides financial assistance for demonstration projects, it is with the general intention of increasing public transit knowledge, rather than limiting the benefits of the project to the participants of the project. Except as otherwise provided in the grant agreement, the grantee is free to copyright any material developed under or during the course of a project.
However, FTA reserves a royalty-free non-exclusive and irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, distribute, or otherwise use, and authorize others to use the work for Government purposes. This applies particularly to FTA-assisted capital and operating projects. In addition, for research, development, and demonstration projects financed with FTA-awarded assistance, FTA reserves the right to acquire greater rights in data including copyrights.
Patent Rights. All grantees must notify FTA of any inventions, improvements, or discoveries conceived of or actually reduced to practice by the grantee or its employees in the course of, or under the terms of, the grant contract. FTA determines whether or not and where a patent application will be filed, as well as the disposition of all rights in such inventions, improvements and/or discoveries, including title to and rights under any patent application or patent that may be issued. The grantee is responsible for executing all documents to effect the determination.
All FTA sponsored reports must contain on the inside front cover the following disclaimer:
"This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof."
When trade names or manufacturers' names are used in a report, this fact must be specifically brought to the attention of FTA before the report is approved. These reports must contain the following notice on the inside front cover:
"The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report."
FTA OVERSIGHT. FTA may conduct on-site inspections of projects to evaluate the grantee's effectiveness in implementing the project in conformance with the grant agreement. Inspection visits may be made, for example, to follow up on information received from the grantee about an event with significant impact on the project, or to determine whether the grantee has adequately complied with civil rights laws, regulations, and agreements. Inspection and concurrence by FTA in project work does not relieve the grantee of its responsibilities and liabilities as the responsible party for carrying out the grant.
Project Management Oversight (PMO).
Definition. Oversight is a continuous review and evaluation of various processes to ensure: compliance with statutory, administrative and regulatory requirements; that FTA national and grantee goals are reached; and improvement of the process (FTA and grantee) and components. Although oversight is focused during various reviews, oversight is actually an ongoing activity. Oversight can also be viewed as an increased emphasis on monitoring the adequacy of grantee systems to ensure proper planning, technical, financial and administrative controls and which will result in improved grantee compliance with statutory and administrative requirements.
Requirement. FTA conducts PMO for major capital projects, using its own staff or a combination of FTA and contractor staff. For general guidance, grantees are required to provide all needed information about each project selected for this oversight. PMO begins as early in project implementation as practical, usually during the preliminary engineering process.
FTA Project Team. FTA may assign its own or contractor staff to provide special oversight or monitoring of major construction or equipment acquisition projects. Contractor staff are generally used for major projects.
Financial Capacity Reviews. These reviews provide data for spot reports on the financial plan and are complementary to project management oversight.
Quarterly Project Management Meetings. Quarterly project management meetings may be instituted with selected grantees. These meetings will provide a forum for management briefings, status/progress reports, discussion of accomplishments and problems and, as appropriate, an opportunity for site inspection. The quarterly meetings do not replace quarterly written reports unless a specific exemption is granted by FTA.
Triennial Reviews. FTA is required by law to perform reviews and evaluations of urbanized area formula program grantees to evaluate formula grant management performance and grantee compliance with current FTA requirements. The reviews must be conducted for each formula grant recipient at least once every three years and integrated into FTA's grant management functions. The reviews are conducted by teams formed by FTA staff and outside contractors following an annual work program. Desk reviews are followed by a site visit. The team documents its findings and recommendations in a draft triennial review report, which is furnished to the grantee for comment before it is released in final form to interested local, State and Federal officials.
When appropriate, corrective actions are recommended to resolve grantees' program management deficiencies. FTA monitors the grantee's actions until compliance with all program requirements is achieved. If needed, FTA can invoke sanctions to assure that grantees act to correct any noted program deficiencies.
Financial Management Systems Reviews. Grantees are selected for FMO review by FTA to provide FTA an oversight tool and the grantees with technical assistance on financial management systems issues. The FMO review scope requires FMO contractors to conduct a series of interviews, full transaction review and appropriate substantive tests. Determination is made whether the grantee's financial management system meets the requirements of the Common Rule (49 CFR Part 18.20), and expresses an objective, external, independent professional opinion to FTA on the effectiveness of the grantees' internal control environment. An average FMO review takes three to four weeks at the grantees' site.
Procurement Reviews. Conduct of procurement system reviews of FTA grantees involves a site visit to ensure that the requirements and standards of the common rule on administrative requirements for grants, 49 CFR Part 18.36 as it specifically applies to procurements, are met.
SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION. The suspension of a grant is an action by FTA which temporarily suspends Federal assistance for a project pending corrective action by the grantee or pending a decision to terminate the grant by FTA. If FTA determines that the grantee has failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the grant agreement, including the civil rights requirement, FTA notifies the grantee in writing of its intent to suspend the grant. FTA may withhold further payments and/or prohibit the grantee from incurring additional obligations pending corrective action by the grantee or a decision to terminate the project for cause. This includes work being performed by third party contractors or consultants. Unless FTA notifies the grantee otherwise, suspension will not invalidate obligations properly incurred by the grantee prior to the date of suspension to the extent that they are uncancelable.
Termination for Cause. FTA may terminate a grant, in whole or in part, at any time before project completion, whenever it determines that the grantee failed to comply with the conditions of the grant including failure to make reasonable progress. FTA will promptly notify the grantee in writing of its intent to terminate and the reasons therefore and the effective date. Payments made to the grantee or recoveries by FTA are in accordance with the terms of the grant agreement and the legal rights and liabilities of both parties as defined in the agreement.
Termination for Convenience. FTA or the grantee may terminate a grant in whole or part, when both parties agree that continuation of the project would not produce results commensurate with the further expenditure of funds. By signing the grant agreement, the grantee agrees at the outset to a termination for convenience in the event FTA makes such a finding. Both parties must agree upon the termination conditions, including the effective date and, in case of partial termination, the portions to be terminated. The grantee may not incur new obligations for the terminated portion after the effective date and must cancel as many outstanding obligations as possible. FTA evaluates each obligation to determine its eligibility for inclusion in project costs. Settlement is made in accordance with terms and conditions of the grant agreement. FTA allows full credit to the recipient for the Federal share of the noncancelable obligations properly incurred by the grantee prior to termination.
Partial Termination. In some cases, FTA may deobligate funds in an approved grant before close-out because the funds are no longer needed to accomplish the grant purpose.
CLOSE-OUT PROCEDURES. Close-out is the process by which FTA determines that all responsibilities and work by the grantee are completed and the associated financial records are closed. Close-out begins immediately after all work activities under the grant are completed and all close-out documentation must be submitted within the following 90 days.
Final Financial Settlement. The grantee must initiate close-out of a grant when all approved activities are completed and applicable Federal funds expended. This requires a letter notifying FTA that the grant is ready for close-out. In order to expedite grant close-out the following should be submitted electronically:
Close-Out by FTA. FTA reserves the right to unilaterally initiate grant close-out. There are certain circumstances that could cause FTA to close-out a grant in whole or in part at any time before project completion such as:
Adjustments to Federal Share of Costs. Necessary adjustments to the Federal share of cost are made after FTA receives and reviews the required close-out information. Adjustments may also be necessary after the audit required by OMB Circular A-133 is performed. FTA funds are not available for audit or other grant activities after a grant has been closed out. Additional information on audit is contained in Chapter III, Financial Management. Any Federal grant funds received by the grantee but not expended must be returned in the form of a check payable to the Federal Transit Administration and mailed to the address shown below, or by wire transfer if the amount is $10,000 or more. See Chapter IV-7 for Pittsburgh lockbox facility mail address and wire transfer ABA number.
Whenever checks are mailed to the lockbox facility in Pittsburgh, the grantee should send a letter of explanation to the FTA Regional Office.
RETENTION AND ACCESS REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDS .
Applicability. This section applies to all financial and programmatic records, supporting documents, statistical records, and other records of recipients which are:
Length of Retention Period.
Starting Date of Retention Period.
Substitution of Photocopies. Copies made by microfilming, photocopying, or similar facsimile methods may be substituted.
Access to Records.
Restrictions on Public Access. The Federal Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) does not apply to grantee records owned and possessed by the grantee. Unless required by State or local law, grantees and subgrantees are not required to provide periodic public access to their records. However, FTA may request a grantee to provide access to those records the grantee maintains on behalf of FTA, (i.e., records required by Federal statute or regulation, such as Davis-Bacon wage records).
Top of Page
DEFINITIONS. The following definitions apply to FTA property management standards.
REAL PROPERTY. The following requirements govern the acquisition, use or disposition of real property purchased with federally participating funds.
Acquisition of Real Property and Relocation of Persons and Their Personal Property. Acquisition of real property and relocation activities necessary to secure property for a project in which there will be Federal funds must be carried out pursuant to the requirements in the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (the Uniform Act), as amended. The Uniform Act is implemented by regulation (49 CFR part 24).
The objective of the Uniform Act is that owners of real property to be acquired for Federal and federally assisted projects be treated fairly and consistently; that persons displaced be treated fairly, consistently and equitably; and that acquiring agencies implement the regulations in a manner that is efficient and cost effective. The regulations implemmenting the Uniform Act are very specific in naming the means to achieve those legislated objectives.
Following are examples of acquisition and relocation actions required in 49 CFR Part 24:
Before making an offer to the property owner, the grantee must first establish market value of the parcel to be purchased. Market value is to be established through a current appraisal and appraisal-review. The owner has a right to accompany the appraiser during examination of the property.
No owner shall be required to surrender possession of real property without either payment of the agreed purchase price to the owners or deposit of the established just compensation in condemnation court and available to the owner. The grantee must expeditiously reimburse property owners for actual, reasonable, and necessary expenses incidental to transfer of title.
If the acquisition leaves the owner with an uneconomical remnant, the grantee must offer to acquire that remnant. An uneconomical remnant is defined as a parcel of real property in which the owner is left with an interest after the partial acquisition of the owner's property, and which the acquiring agency has determined has little or no value or utility to the owner.
Any decrease or increase in market value caused by the project or caused by the likelihood that a particular property is to be acquired for the project will be disregarded in determining just compensation for the property.
Early provision of written explanations of acquisition and relocation programs.
No individual, family, partnership, corporation or association will be required to move without at least 90 days advance notice.
In the case of residential displaces, the 90-day notice must also include the availability of at least one comparable replacement dwelling. Rental assistance and replacement housing payments are provided to make the dwellings affordable
All displacees--both business and residential--are reimbursed for certain moving expenses.
There must be as many residential dwellings available as there are families who will be displaced. The dwellings must be comparable to the ones from which the persons are displaced. In addition, the comparable replacement dwellings must be decent, safe and sanitary; located in the same area or in areas generally not less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities; reasonably accessible to the displacees' places of employment and within the financial means of the displaced families; and adequate in size to accommodate the occupants.
Replacement housing must be open to all persons regardless of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
In addition, the grantee should inform itself of State laws regarding compensation for real property and requirements for relocation of persons and personal property.
Contaminated Property (including Brownfields). Appraisals should consider the effect, if any, the contamination has on the market value of the property being valued. Appropriate due diligence for contamination should have been conducted as a part of the NEPA process and discussed in the NEPA document before selection of a brownfield site in a capital project. The results of the due diligence should be given tothe appraiser since the information should prove useful in estimating market value. Federal and local environmental regulatory programs originate from statutory laws and regulations, therefore words and terms often possess specific legal definitions. For convenience we use only the terms, "contamination" and "hazardous material." These terms should be interpreted broadly to include all contaminants that can affect property value.
The legal responsibility for hazardous material clean-up and disposal rests with parties within the property title chain and with parties responsible for the placement of the material on the property. Grantees must attempt to identify and seek legal recourse from those potentially responsible parties or substantiate the basis for not seeking reimbursement.
During the NEPA process, the grant applicant will have considered not only the estimated project cost of appropriate remediation (remediation being any action, developed in consultation with appropriate regulatory agencies, to reduce, remove or contain contamination), the applicant will also have considered and taken action regarding the short and long-term liabilities associated with brownfields.
To encourage the complete assessment of contamination prior to project decision-making, FTA generally will not participate in the remediation of contamination discovered during construction whose encounter was not anticipated.
The grantee should contact FTA for technical assistance regarding contaminated property.
General. Except as discussed below, an offer of just compensation will be established on the basis of a recent independently prepared appraisal that estimates a fair market value. Appraisers who are not staff employees must be certified appraisers. It is recommended that appraisals and review appraisals be completed by appraisers experienced with State and Federal laws for valuing properties for public acquisitions. Appraisers, and grantees making appraisal assignments should be familiar with the implementing regulations of the Uniform Act (49 C.F.R. 24), especially subpart B. Depending on the individual State Appraisal Board, certified appraisers may need to utilize the jurisdictional exception provisions of Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) in order to complete the assignment for a public agency. When valuing properties that contain contamination or hazardous material, the appraiser must consider the effect, if any, the contamination's or material's presence has on the market value.
Exceptions. Full appraisal and/or negotiation procedures are not necessary in certain instances. FTA should be contacted for further guidance when any one of the following situations occurs:
Review Appraisals. All appraisals for acquisition of real property are to be reviewed in accordance with the Uniform Act. The review appraisal should determine the soundness of the report's value estimate. The review appraiser is often expected to determine if the value conclusion is consistent with State laws for public acquisitions and with the the Uniform Act. The review appraiser often is also responsible for assuring that value estimates are consistent when multiple parcels of property are needed for the project. The review appraisal cannot determine the soundness of a report's value estimate without the review appraiser possessing familiarity with the subject, its comparables and other market factors; rarely will a mere desk review be sufficient.
The Uniform Act contains options for the grantee when its review appraiser is unable to recommend approval of an appraisal. Review appraisers who are not staff employees must be certified appraisers.
FTA Oversight of Property Acquisition .
Prior FTA concurrence is required when the grantee's recommended offer of just compensation exceeds $250,000, or when a property appraised at $250,000 or more must be condemned.
Instead of using its power of eminent domain, when a property cannot be purchased at appraised value, a grantee may propose acquisition through negotiated settlement. The grantee must document that reasonable efforts to purchase the property at the appraised amount have failed and prepare written justification supporting why the settlement is reasonable, prudent and in the public interest. A litigation attorney must provide the justification when the settlement purchase represents a significant increase. The attorney should evaluate the risks of settling for the proposed amount versus the risks of trying the condemnation in court. Prior FTA concurrence is needed when the settlement is $50,000 higher than the offer.
Alternative Procedure. A grantee,conducting a major capital project or one with a fully staffed real estate department, may prefer an alternative process, which permits higher dollar thresholds before FTA prior concurrence is needed. To do this, an FTA real estate specialist must review and approve the processes used in acquiring and clearing real estate. Grantees may request a review through the FTA Regional Office.
In-Kind Contributions. Grantees may use in-kind contributions of real property as part of the local matching share are eligible for a grant if the property to be donated is needed to carry out the scope of the approved project. The property can be owned and donated by the grantee or by a third party. The in-kind contribution allowance will be based on the current market value as independently appraised.
Credit can only be allowed for the value of the portion of real property used or consumed by the project. The request must include a statement that Federal funds were not used to purchase the property. Only the non-federal share of the property may be counted as local share.
Use. Title to real property is vested in the grantees or other public bodies. It is FTA's policy to permit grantees maximum flexibility in determining the best and most cost-effective use of FTA-funded property. To this end, FTA encourages incidental uses of real property that can raise additional revenues for the transit system or, at a reasonable cost, enhance system ridership. For example, grantees may be able to encourage incidental use of air rights at and over transit facilities and project areas. FTA approval is required for these incidental uses of real property which must be compatible with the original purposes of the grant.
Incidental use of project real property is subject to the following considerations.
Excess Real Property Inventory and Utilization Plan. The grantee should prepare and keep up to date an excess property utilization plan for all property that is no longer needed to carry out the originally intended purpose. Grantees are also required to notify FTA when property is removed from the service originally intended at grant approval and put to additional or substitute uses.
The grantee's plan should identify and explain the reason for excess property. Such reasons may include one or more of the following.
The inventory list should include such things as property location; summary of any conditions on the title, original acquisition cost and the Federal participation ratio; FTA grant number, appraised value and date; a brief description of improvements; current use of the property; and the anticipated disposition or action proposed.
Unless FTA and the grantee agree otherwise, the excess real property inventory and updated excess property utilization plan is to be retained by the grantee, available upon FTA request and during the Triennial Review process.
Disposition Alternatives. If the grantee determines that real property is no longer needed for the approved project, FTA may approve use of the property for other purposes. This may include use in other Federal grant programs or in non-Federal programs that have consistent purposes with those authorized for support by FTA.
In those situations where a grantee or subgrantee is disposing of real property acquired with grant funds and acquiring replacement real property under the same program, FTA may permit the net proceeds from the disposition to be used as an offset to the cost of the replacement property.
When real property is no longer needed for the originally authorized purpose, the grantee will request disposition instructions from FTA. Following are the allowable alternative disposition methods.
Sell and Reimburse FTA. Competitively market and sell the property and pay FTA its share of the fair market value of the property. This is the percentage of FTA participation in the original grant times the best obtainable price, net of reasonable sales costs.
Offset. Sell property and apply the net proceeds from the sale to the cost of replacement property under the same program. Return any excess proceeds to FTA. [Common Rule CFR49 part 18.31]
Sell and Use Proceeds for Other Capital Projects. Sell property and use the proceeds to reduce the gross project cost of another FTA eligible capital transit project. [49 U.S.C., 5334(g)(4)]. The grantee is expected to record the receipt of the proceeds in the grantee's accounting system, showing that the funds are restricted for use in a subsequent capital project, and reduce the liabilitiy as the proceeds are applied to one or more FTA approved capital projects. The subsequent capital grant application should contain information showing FTA that the gross project cost has been reduced with proceeds from the earlier transaction.
Sell and Keep Proceeds in Open Project. If the grant is still open, the grantee may sell excess property and apply the proceeds to the original cost of the total real property purchased for that project.
Transfer to Public Agency for Non-Transit Use. Follow procedures for publication in Federal Register to transfer property (land or equipment) to public agency with no repayment to FTA. This is a competitive process and there is no guarantee that a particular public agency will be awarded the excess property. [49 U.S.C., 5334(g)(1)]
Transfer to Other Project. Transfer property to another FTA eligible project. The Federal interest continues.
Retain Title With Buyout. Compensate FTA by computing percentage of FTA participation in the original cost. Multiply the current fair market value of the property by this percentage. The grantee must document the basis for value determination; typically this is an appraisal or market survey.
Sales procedures shall be followed that provide for competition to the extent practicable and result in the highest possible return or at least payment of appraised fair market value.
Joint Development. A transfer meeting the three tests for joint development is not a disposition and the proceeds are deemed program income.
[See Joint Development Appendix at end of this circular for more detailed information. Also see FTA Circular 9300.1A, Capital Program: Grant Application Instructions, Appendix B]
EQUIPMENT. Certain equipment management standards apply to equipment purchased with Federal funds. Following are guidelines for the acquisition, use and disposition of equipment.
State recipients. A State will use, manage, and dispose of equipment acquired under a grant by the State in accordance with State laws and procedures. [49 CFR, part 18.32(b)]
Title. Subject to the obligations and conditions set forth in this section, title to equipment acquired under a grant or subgrant will vest upon acquisition in the grantee, subgrantee or another participating public body.
Use of Equipment.
Leasing Agreement. The grantee may enter into a contract for leasing its project equipment and facilities to a private operator (the lessee). Under this arrangement the grantee (the lessor) should include the following provisions in the proposed lease agreement:
Management. Equipment management procedures include the following minimum requirements:
Top of Page
Definition. Internal controls are the organization plan, methods and procedures adopted by the grantee to insure that resources are properly used and safeguarded, and that necessary information is provided to grantees and FTA managers.
General. FTA payments to a grantee are made electronically to meet the Federal share of eligible expenses under a grant.
Acceptance of an FTA grant obligates the grantee to use funds it receives as specified in the grant agreement. This creates a vested interest by the United States in unused grant balances, any improperly applied funds, and property or facilities purchased or otherwise acquired under the grant whether funds are received by the grantee as an advance or by reimbursement.
Grantees and subgrantees are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over all their functions that affect implementation of a grant.
For proper management of grants, these controls must be used by each grantee in all its operating, accounting, financial and administrative systems. To assure proper accountability for grant funds, internal controls must be integrated with the management systems used by the grantee to regulate and guide it operations.
Objectives. Resources must be used in accordance with applicable state, local, and Federal laws, regulations and policies, and the grant assistance agreement. Resources must be safeguarded against waste, loss, and misuse. Reliable data on resource use and safeguards must be accumulated, maintained and fairly disclosed in reports to grantee management and FTA. A proper system of internal controls will help the grantee to:
Necessary Elements. Certain elements are necessary to achieve these objectives and meet the standards discussed later in this chapter. Each facilitates the grantee's use of internal controls. These are:
Standards of Internal Control and Audit Resolutions.
Financial Management Systems. Minimum requirements of a grantee's financial management system are contained in the Common Rule, 49 CFR part 18.20(b).
[Exception: State Financial Management Systems. The common rule (49 CFR, Part 18.20(a) requires a state to expend and account for grant funds in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for its own funds.]
For other than state recipients and subrecipients, each grantee and subgrantee must establish and maintain an adequate financial management system that provides for:
FTA Review of Grantee's Internal Controls. DOT auditors or designated Financial Management Oversight representatives may visit a grantee after project approval to review its system of internal controls. The review will address grantee compliance with the internal and financial control standards.
FTA will provide the grantee with a copy of the review and discuss action by the grantee to correct any reported deficiencies.
Financial capacity reviews are performed on grantees involved in major capital investment projects. The review assesses the financial capability of grantees to meet Full Funding Grant Agreement obligations. The financial capacity reviews analyze plans to mitigate the risks associated with:
COST ALLOCATION PLAN/INDIRECT COST PROPOSAL.
General. Under federally funded grant programs, recipients may incur costs of both a direct and indirect nature. A cost allocation plan is required if a grantee desires to charge indirect program-related costs to an FTA grant.
Incurred for a common or joint purpose benefiting more than one cost objective;
Not readily assignable to the cost objectives specifically benefited, without effort disproportionate to the results achieved; and
Originating in each of the grantee's operating or organizational units (as well as those incurred by others in supplying goods, services, and facilities to each unit).
Examples of indirect costs are operation and maintenance of buildings and expenses of unit heads and their immediate staff. Principles and standards for determining costs applicable to grants and contracts with grantees or other state or local agencies are presented in OMB Circular A-87, and the appropriate Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) publications.
Types of Plans. There are two types of cost allocation plans presented in OMB Circular A-87.
The first plan covers the distribution of costs of support services provided by a state/local government to its operating agencies and is referred to as a state or local government-wide central service cost allocation plan.
The second plan covers distribution of costs within an individual grantee or contractor (i.e., operative) agency, including costs of services allocated to it under the state or local government-wide central service cost allocation plan, for all work performed by that agency. This second type of plan is commonly referred to as an indirect cost plan.
DHHS brochure, ASMB C-10 contains questions and answers regarding cost allocation plans and sample formats for both plans. This document is available with updates and changes through the Government Printing Office by subscription, or on the DHHS web site at: www.os.dhhs.gov/progorg/GrantsNet/index.html. It provides the implementation guide for A-87 and may be reproduced without permission.
Preparation of Plan. Grantees who intend to seek FTA reimbursement for indirect costs must prepare a cost allocation plan and/or indirect cost rate plan.
Purpose. The purpose of the plan is to guide the grantee's allocation of costs, assuring that:
Steps in Plan Development. Four steps are basic in preparing a cost allocation plan:
Once FTA or another cognizant Federal agency has accepted a grantee's cost allocation plan or indirect cost rate proposal, the grantee must update it annually. The update should be retained and made available for review at the time of the grantee's organization-wide audit.
Cognizant Federal Agency. Cognizance is generally assigned to the Federal agency that provides the predominant amount of dollar involvement with a grantee organization within a given state or locality. (OMB has assigned cognizant audit agencies for state and local Governments -- Federal Register, 1-6-86.). The cost allocation plan/indirect cost rate proposal should be submitted to the "cognizant" or "lead" Federal agency when:
The grantee is working on its first assistance project or has not previously had a cost allocation plan/indirect cost rate proposal reviewed and accepted;
The grantee has made a change in its accounting system, thereby affecting the previously approved cost allocation plan/indirect cost rate and its basis of application; or
The grantee's proposed cost allocation plan/indirect cost rate exceeds the amounts and rates approved for the previous year(s) by more than ten percent.
In other instances, the grantee should forego submission of its annual cost allocation plan/indirect cost rate proposal directly to the cognizant agency, retaining the documents for future review. In accordance with OMB Circular A-133, this review will be accomplished at the time of the organization-wide audit of the grantee.
If DOT is the cognizant agency, cost allocation plans should be sent to FTA for DOT review unless the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the primary awarding agency. In that case, the plans should be sent to FHWA with a copy to FTA.
Costs Supported. All costs in the plan must be supported by formal accounting records to substantiate the propriety of eventual charges. The allocation plan of the grantee should cover all applicable costs. It should also cover costs allocated under plans of other agencies or organizational units which are to be included in the costs of other federally sponsored programs. To the extent feasible, cost allocation plans of all agencies rendering assistance to the grantee should be presented in a single document.
The cost allocation plan should contain, but need not be limited to the following:
Plan Content. The cost allocation plan should contain, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:
Individual position or group classifications for direct staff services;
The annual salary rate or salary range for each position classification, with estimated average salary charged to the project for each rate;
The estimated period of service as provided by each position classification, estimates of percentage of time each position will devote to the project, and the estimated cost of each;
The nature and extent of services provided by each position classification;
Details of other direct charges including the nature of charges and estimated costs; and
All categories of indirect costs, proposed methods, and the basis for allocating them to the project, total indirect costs, and the estimated amount to be charged to the project.
It is important to note that although personnel services should be estimated on a percentage-of-time basis for planning purposes, only actual time charged to the project as supported by adequate time sheets will be eligible for reimbursement.
Plan Approval. Most transit agencies are under the cognizance of the Department of Transportation. Whenever the cognizant agency gives prior approval to a government-wide cost allocation plan or indirect cost proposal, such approval is formalized, distributed to all interested Federal agencies, and applicable to all Federal grants in accordance with OMB Circular A-87.
General. Grantees must follow the guidelines contained in OMB Circular A-87 (state and local governments), in determining whether project costs are allowable or unallowable. Project costs must specifically relate to the purpose of the grant contract and the latest approved project budget. Care must be exercised when incurring costs to ensure that all expenditures meet the criteria of eligible costs. Failure to exercise proper discretion may result in expenditures for which use of project funds cannot be authorized.
General. The criteria that govern the eligibility of project costs are discussed below. These criteria are drawn from OMB Circular A-87. To be allowable under a grant program, costs must:
General. FTA's program income policies are governed by 49 CFR, Part 18, the Common Rule, and apply to all FTA planning and capital grants governed by this circular except for approved grants that contain specific terms and conditions to the contrary. See Chapter I, section 11 of this circular for additional information regarding Program Income.
Accountability. Grantees must account for program income in their accounting system, which is subject to audit. The accounting system must be capable of identifying program income and the purpose for which it was used.
FINANCIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.
General. FTA uses the Milestone/Progress Report to monitor project funds through the electronic award and management system. Note that payment can be withheld for failure to submit either financial or narrative reports in a timely manner.
Disclosure Criteria. The following criteria are basic to full disclosure in financial reports by recipients:
Milestone/Progress Reports. Electronic financial status reporting is required for all capital grants covered under this circular, as well as combination capital/operating grants. These quarterly reports are to be submitted electronically.
These reports are to be submitted for all non-construction and construction projects on an accrual basis.
General. OMB Circular A-133, "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations" and provisional OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement of May 1998 provides the requirements for annual audits of grant recipients. Both documents are available on the OMB web site at http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/OMB/Grants/.
Requirement. FTA grantees are required to obtain the services of an independent auditor to conduct a single audit each year in conformance with OMB Circular A133, except where a state constitution or statute provides for a single biennial audit.
Purpose. The purpose of the single annual audit report is to determine whether the grantee:
Has prepared financial statements that fairly present its financial position and the results of its financial position and the results of its financial operations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Has in place internal accounting and other control systems to provide reasonable assurance that it is managing Federal financial assistance programs in compliance with applicable laws and regulations; and
Has complied with laws and regulations that may have material effect on its financial statements and on each of its major Federal assistance programs (as defined according to the sliding scale discussed in A-133).
The annual single audit is to be performed by an independent auditor who is required to determine and report on whether the grantee has internal control systems that reasonably assure it is managing Federal assistance programs in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Review of a proposed contract for the services of an independent auditor can be arranged through FTA with the grantee's cognizant Federal auditor.
Grantees are required to determine whether certain subgrantees spend Federal assistance funds they receive in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Audit judgment concerning the grantee's determination is left to the independent auditor.
Sufficient copies of the single audit reports (1 for file and 1 for each Federal agency with findings) should be sent to the Audit Clearing House, 1201 E. 10th Street, Jeffersonville, IN 47132.
Resolution of Audit Findings. Grantees and subgrantees are responsible for prompt resolution of all audit findings and recommendations. This responsibility requires that the grantee:
Deficiencies or opportunities for improvement identified in an audit must be resolved by the grantee. The resolution of audits begins with FTA's report to the grantee and continues until the grantee corrects identified deficiencies, implements needed improvements or demonstrates that the findings or recommendations are not valid or do not warrant management action.
The audit is not resolved until FTA concurs in the documentation of steps taken to implement any needed corrective actions. The status of outstanding audit findings and recommendations should be monitored and reported by the grantee in quarterly progress reports and, where appropriate, significant events reported.
THIRD PARTY CONTRACT AUDITS.
Responsibility for Audit. Grantees must ensure that grant-assisted activities are carried out effectively and efficiently. Audit of third party contracts is an important tool available to grantees in meeting this obligation. A third party audit may be initiated by the grantee as part of its own management process. For example, consultant, engineering or service contracts commonly include provisional overhead (burden) and General & Administrative (G & A) rates which need to be verified by audit for the applicable contract periods. Contract audits may also be requested by FTA to ascertain that payments were made in conformance with the terms of the contract, or for other purposes. Finally, audit of a third party contract may be recommended by the firm conducting the grantee's single annual audit.
Third party contract audits must be conducted by auditors who are independent from the third-party contractor.
Outside Audit Services. Many FTA grantees assign proposal evaluation and contract monitoring duties to their own auditors or financial management personnel. However, some do not have qualified personnel within their organization to conduct this kind of audit review. They must obtain these services elsewhere. Two available sources for audit services are qualified independent accounting firms and contract auditors from agencies and departments of the Federal Government. Private firms usually are able to initiate the audit sooner after the grantee's request than a Federal agency can, but in some cases, a continuing Federal audit function is maintained at contractor locations and can be used for audit of FTA grantees' third party contracts. In other cases, an audit by a Federal agency may best serve the overall government interest.
Costs. Costs of third party contract audit and proposal evaluation are eligible for reimbursement by FTA as a direct or indirect charge in accordance with OMB Circular A-87. FTA recommends that grantees seek guidance from the cognizant Federal auditor before negotiating audit contract agreements. (Cognizant Federal audit is earlier described under Annual Audit in this chapter).
Contracting for Audit Services. In contracting with a private firm for an independent audit, grantees should follow standard procedures for third party contracts. Grantees should direct requests for Federal audit assistance to FTA.
Top of Page
Payment Methods. FTA makes all payments by the Automated Clearing House (ACH) method of payment, regardless of the money amount involved. The cash payments to grantees are made using two ACH methods:
Electronic Clearing House Operation (ECHO) Payment; and
Under these ACH methods, FTA provides payment to grantees by electronically wiring funds to the recipient's financial institution.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circulars A-102, A-110 and 31 (CFR) Part 205, governs payment to recipients for financing operations under Federal grant and other programs. These regulations require that payment to a grantee be limited to the minimum amounts needed and timed so as to be in accord only with the actual, immediate cash requirements of the grantee in carrying out the approved project. For further information regarding cash management procedures, refer to the FTA "ECHO System Users Manual for Grantees."
Disallowed Costs. In determining the amount of Federal assistance FTA will provide, FTA will exclude:
Any project costs incurred by the grantee prior to the date of either the approved grant or the approved project budget (whichever is earlier), unless otherwise permitted by Federal law or regulation or unless an authorized representative of FTA states in writing to the contrary; and
Any costs attributable to goods or services received under a contract or other arrangement that is required to be, but has not been, concurred in or approved in writing by FTA.
The grantee agrees that reimbursement of any cost in accordance with indicated payment methods for an approved grant does not constitute a final FTA decision about the allowability of that cost and does not constitute a waiver of any violation by the grantee of the terms of approved grant. The grantee understands that FTA will not make a final determination about allowability until an audit of the project has been conducted. If the government determines that the grantee is not entitled to receive any part of the Federal funds requested, the government will notify the grantee stating the reasons. Project closeout will not alter the recipient's obligation to return any funds due to FTA as a result of later refunds, corrections, or other transactions. Nor will project closeout alter FTA's right to disallow costs and recover funds on the basis of a later audit or other review. Unless prohibited by law, FTA may offset any Federal assistance funds to be made available under this project necessary to satisfy any outstanding monetary claims that FTA may have against the grantee. Exceptions pertaining to disallowed costs are set forth in FTA directives or in other written Federal guidance.
Requirement to Remit Interest. The Grantee agrees that:
Any interest earned by the grantee on Federal funds must be remitted to FTA, except as provided by 31 U.S.C. Section 6503, or the Indian Self-Determination Act, 23 U.S.C. Section 450, and any regulations thereunder that may be issued by the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury.
Irrespective of whether the grantee has deposited funds in an interest-bearing account, the grantee agrees to pay to FTA interest on any FTA funds that the grantee has drawn down and failed to spend for project activities. Unless waived by FTA, interest will be calculated at rates imposed by the Secretary of the Treasury beginning on the fourth business day after the funds were deposited in the grantee's bank or other financial depository. This requirement does not apply to any grantee that is a State, State Instrumentality, or Indian Tribal Government.
Upon notice by the FTA to the grantee of specific amounts due FTA , the grantee agrees to promptly remit any excess payment of amounts or disallowed costs to FTA, including any interest due thereon.
Bond Interest. To the extent permitted by FTA, bond interest is an allowable cost.
De-obligation of Funds. FTA reserves the right to deobligate unspent Federal funds prior to project closeout.
Right of FTA to Terminate. The grantee agrees that, upon written notice, FTA may suspend or terminate all or part of the financial assistance provided herein if the grantee is, or has been, in violation of the terms of the approved grant, or if FTA determines that the purposes of the statute under which the project is authorized would not be adequately served by continuation of Federal financial assistance for the project. Any failure to make reasonable progress or other violation of the approved grant that significantly endangers substantial performance of the project shall be deemed to be a breach of the approved grant.
In general, termination of any financial assistance under the approved grant will not invalidate obligations properly incurred by the grantee and concurred in by FTA before the termination date, to the extent those obligations cannot be canceled. However, if FTA determines that the grantee has willfully misused FTA assistance funds by failing to make adequate progress; to make reasonable use of the project real property, facilities, or equipment; or to honor the terms of the approved grant, FTA reserves the right to require the grantee to refund the entire amount of Federal funds provided herein or any lesser amount as may be determined by FTA.
Expiration of any project time period established for this project, does not, by itself constitute an expiration or termination of the approved grant.
Neither the receipt by the grantee of any Federal funds for the project nor the closeout of Federal financial participation in the project shall constitute a waiver of any claim that FTA may otherwise have arising out of the approved grant.
ELECTRONIC CLEARING HOUSE OPERATION PAYMENT METHOD.
Objective. If payment is made under ECHO, by means of an ECHO Control Number (ECN), the grantee agrees to comply with the following ECHO requirements pursuant to OMB Circulars A-102, A-110, and 31 CFR, Part 205 and as established by the "Guidelines for Disbursements" set forth in the FTA ECHO System Users Manual for Grantees.
The grantee may initiate cash drawdowns only when actually needed for immediate disbursement required for project purposes. Accordingly, the grantee agrees to expend all Federal funds obtained under the project for project purposes no later than three business days after receipt of those funds.
Failure to expend those Federal funds within three business days of their receipt or to return the funds to FTA within a reasonable period, or an unwillingness or inability on the recipient's part to establish procedures that will minimize the time elapsing between cash advances and the disbursement shall cause FTA to revoke or temporarily suspend the grantee's ECHO Control Number and the grantee's access to the ECHO System. In addition, failure to honor these requirements may result in other remedies authorized by Federal law or regulations.
The grantee agrees to report its cash disbursements and balances in a timely manner as required by FTA through completion of the Status of Federal Funds Report when requested.
The grantee agrees to provide for control and accountability for all project funds consistent with Federal requirements and procedures for use of the ECHO system.
The grantee may not draw down funds for a project in an amount that would exceed the sum obligated by FTA or the current available balance for that project.
The grantee shall limit drawdowns to eligible project costs and refrain from drawing down Federal funds before they are needed for disbursement.
The grantee agrees to all applicable requirements in accordance with paragraphs 2b(1) through (5) on its sub-recipients.
The grantee must notify the appropriate FTA regional office when an individual draw down will exceed $50 million. (In turn, the FTA Headquarters Accounting Office should be notified by the regional office, because FTA must provide Treasury with 48 hours prior notification to draw down funds exceeding $50 million.)
Procedures to Apply for Electronic Clearing House Operation. The following reference is a brief outline of the procedures under the ECHO method of reimbursement.
The Treasury Financial Communications System (TFCS) - Letter of Credit (LOC) method previously used was phased out by the Department of Treasury on 12-31-90.)
FTA determines that a grantee should be funded under the ECHO method and sends the grantee an "ECHO Systems Users Manual" for Grantees which includes the applicable information and forms which are required to establish an ECN.
The responsible FTA regional office must approve all projects under the ECHO method before an ECN can be authorized for the grantee organization. This also applies to existing active projects that are currently being paid via the requisition method.
The grantee completes and returns to FTA an original Signatory Authorization and Certification letter (see Exhibit IV-1) and a Payment Information Form (see Exhibit IV-2).
FTA reviews the completed forms and when approved, initiates the process to establish the grantee on the ECHO system.
FTA furnishes the grantee a notification for establishment of an ECN and provides the password for ECHO access by certified mail.
Following the effective date of the ECN, the grantee may transmit an ECHO Drawdown request message to FTA in order to receive funds necessary to meet immediate cash disbursement needs.
The ECHO System processes the grantee's message. If no problems are noted by FTA, the amount requested or a partial amount is transmitted to Treasury via the Electronic Certification System (ECS).
Treasury electronically transfers the payment to the grantee's financial institution within 24 hours.
In the event a grantee receiving funds by an ECN demonstrates an unwillingness or inability to establish procedures to minimize the time elapsing between the withdrawal of funds under the ECN and the disbursement of such funds, FTA will cancel the ECN to the extent of the undisbursed balance not obligated in good faith in execution of the Federal project as authorized, and require the grantee to finance its operations with its own working capital.
FTA encourages issuance of a single consolidated ECN to cover all payments to a grantee for grant programs covered by this circular. If the grantee or FTA administrative needs require more than one ECN, FTA must approve issuance of another. In no instance may one project be included on more than one ECN.
An "ECHO Systems Users Manual for Grantees" is also available from FTA that details ECHO procedures for Grantees.
Grantee Organization Requirements.
Signatory Authorization and Certification. The grantee organization must submit a Signatory Authorization and Certification Letter containing the signature of the Authorizing Official (s), signature of the head of the organization or designee, contact person and the official stamp/seal of the organization.
Payment Information. The grantee organization must complete all information on the Payment Information Form containing the organization's contact person, bank account and routing numbers, and the original signatures of the organization's authorizing official and bank representative.
Request for Payment on ECHO. The grantee organization must access the ECHO System each time funds are needed to meet current cash disbursement needs. The instructions for accessing the ECHO System are included in the FTA ECHO System Users Manual for Grantees.
Planning ECHO Withdrawals. The grantee organization must exercise sound financial judgment and planning to ensure that the requirements for maintaining minimum cash balances are met.
Rejection of Messages. The transmitted message will be edited by ECHO for errors, deficiencies, or omissions which may necessitate the rejection of all or part of the request:
Excessive or Premature Withdrawals. In accordance with the Common Rule (49 CFR 18.21), when excessive cash is being held by a grantee, FTA must request a refund of the excessive cash and, if the grantee is not a State Government or an instrumentality of the state, the interest earned on those funds. However, FTA requires that interest on excess cash held be remitted irrespective of whether the excess funds were deposited into an interest-bearing account. Interest will be calculated at rates imposed by the Secretary of the Treasury beginning on the fourth day after the funds were deposited in the recipient's bank or other financial depository. This requirement does not apply to any grantee that is a State, State Instrumentality, or Indian Tribal Government.
Exceptions. The only exceptions to the requirement for prompt refunding are when the funds involved:
Will be disbursed by the grantee within seven calendar days; or
Are less than $10,000 and will be disbursed within 30 calendar days.
These exceptions to the requirement for prompt refunding should not be construed as approval for a grantee to maintain excessive funds. They are applicable only to excessive amounts of funds which are erroneously drawn.
Return of Funds. The return of funds is accomplished as follows:
FTA requests the recipients to remit the excessive cash and any interest to FTA by a check made payable to the Federal Transit Administration. If a single check is used to remit both the premature withdrawal and the interest, the amount of each must be separately identified; and
The check (s) are to be mailed to the FTA lockbox facility (see paragraph h(2) below) and be accompanied by a letter explaining the purpose of the check(s) and identifying the project number. A copy of the check and the letter should be sent to the grantee's regional office.
Repayment to FTA. FTA program managers will be alert to any information which may indicate a potential repayment. The following are possible reasons for payments becoming due to FTA:
insufficient non-Federal funds to match Federal payments;
the sale of project equipment; or
excessive Federal funds in the project account.
Repayment Procedure. Required repayments must be made promptly to FTA. The grantee is instructed to:
Make the check payable to "Federal Transit Administration;"
Mail all checks to the FTA lockbox facility at:
U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration
P. O. Box 360324M
Pittsburgh, PA 15251-6324
If $10,000 or more, the amount should be wired to FTA using Treasury's New York City Federal Reserve Bank for deposit to FTA Agency Location Code (ALC) 69080001, ABA # 021030004;
Specify applicable project number(s) on the check;
Provide written explanation as to purpose of payment;
Send a copy of the check and the explanatory letter to the grantee's regional office; and
If the project is on ECHO, the amount may be repaid through a credit on the FTA drawdown message. This credit must be shown in full and not netted against any amount being claimed on the same project, unless an appropriate credit is shown for the original project, with a charge to the new project. Payments of interest must be made by check.
Revocation of ECHO Control Number.
An ECN will be revoked when it has been determined that the grantee has demonstrated an unwillingness or inability to establish procedures to withdraw only the amounts necessary to meet current disbursement needs and to time withdrawals as closely as possible to the actual cash disbursements.
REQUEST FOR ADVANCE OR REIMBURSEMENT (SF-270).
General. If the requisition method of payment is used, the grantee agrees to:
Complete and submit "Payment Information Form - ACH Payment System" (See Exhibit IV-2) to FTA's Accounting Division. Under ECHO Control Number (ECN) insert: Not Applicable (N/A).
Complete and submit Standard Form 270, "Request for Advance or Reimbursement," (See Exhibit IV-3) to the designated FTA office. No other document need accompany this form. An original and two copies should be sent to FTA.
Upon receipt of a payment request, FTA will authorize payment by ACH deposit if the grantee is complying with its obligations under the approved grant; has satisfied FTA that it needs the requested Federal funds during the requisition period; and is making adequate progress toward the timely completion of the project. If all these circumstances are present, FTA may reimburse apparent allowable costs incurred (or to be incurred during the requisition period) by the grantee up to the maximum amount of Federal funds payable through the fiscal year in which the requisition is submitted, as stated in the project budget.
Instructions. Instructions for completing an SF-270 are printed on its reverse side. In addition, the following instructions should assist recipients in completing this form.
Only the total column on this form should be completed, unless the project involves more than one funding ratio. In such instances, the other columns are also to be used.
In addition, grantees may elect to round all figures to the nearest dollar; i.e., amounts of $.50 or over would be rounded to the higher dollar. For example: If the non-Federal share is computed to be $2,572.70, the amount reported would be $2,573.
Block #5--All requisitions should be numbered consecutively beginning with #1 as the first requisition.
Block #8--The first requisition covers the date of the grant approval letter through the end of the period for which reimbursement is requested. When a requisition requests reimbursement only, the "ending" date will be the same date on which outlays are reported on line 11a of this form. If the reimbursement and/or an advance is being requested, the "ending' date should reflect the period through which the advance funds are needed.
All requisition report periods should run consecutively. For example, if a requisition is submitted for the period 1/1/99 to 3/31/99, the next requisition will begin 4/1/99.
Block #9--The name of the grantee should be exactly as indicated on the grant contract.
Block #11--Line A--The "as of" date should be the date for which the grantee has actual costs recorded. This date should be the same as the "to" date, Block #8, unless the grantee is requesting an advance.
Line B--Represents the amount applicable to program income that was required to be used for the project or program by terms of the grant or other agreement.
Line D--Represents the estimated expenditures for the advance period, both FTA share and the local share.
Line F--Non-Federal share of line E, depending on the funding ratio for a particular project. If anything other than those percentages, the reason should be specified.
Line G--Federal share of line E, depending on the funding ratio for a particular project.
Line H--Total of previous requisition(s) submitted. This line should not represent actual checks received because the grantee may have submitted a requisition that is in the process of being paid. Requisition #1 on this line should be zero.
Note that recipients should only complete the "total" column of Block #11, unless the grant award letter or grant agreement specified that there is more than one funding source supporting the project. In such cases, separate columns should be utilized for each funding source.
Review of the SF-270. Each SF-270 for funds will be reviewed in light of the periodic progress reports and financial reports required for each project. Changes requiring grant amendments or prior approval of a budget revision must be approved before funds for these changes are requisitioned.
EXHIBITS IV-1 through IV-3 follow
Exhibit IV-1 * Exhibit IV-2 * Exhibit IV-3
Top of Page
BUDGET REVISION - A transfer of funds within an approved grant budget. None of the budget revisions described below permits a change in the grant amount, scope, or terms and conditions.
PLANNING GRANTS: 49 U.S.C. Sections 5303 and 5313(b).
URBANIZED AREA FORMULA PROGRAM: including Planning, Capital and Operating Grants under 49 U.S.C. Section 5307.
Capital Program: 49 U.S.C. Section 5309.
Budget revisions that do not require prior FTA approval are:
Fund transfers within scope and between scopes of same matching ratio if under 20 percent of most recently FTA-approved budget, or if under 30 percent for planning grants;
Adding activities that are within scope;
With prior FTA approval and limitations listed below, a budget revision is also used to:
Refer to section 6 of chapter I for more detailed information.
ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENT - An amendment normally initiated by FTA that is needed to change or clarify the terms, conditions or provisions of a grant contract, but does not change the scope, amount or purpose of the grant.
An administrative amendment is used to modify a grant contract for such purposes as to comply with changes required by FTA law, to change the year or type of funds obligated for a grant, to transfer equipment from one grantee to another or to reflect a change in the grantee's name - all programs.
GRANT AMENDMENT - A change in the scope of a grant or the Federal participation. A grant amendment requires a revised grant agreement and budget, and may require obligation of additional funds, reduction of the amount of funds obligated or deobligation and obligation of funds.
The following are considered scope changes for planning, capital and operating grants:
Top of Page
|One Time Events||Periodic or Reoccurring Events||Events that May Occur|
|Notice of grant approval.Sign grant agreement.Set up ECHO procedures if needed.|
|Submit Annual Certifications and Assurances which will assure grantee controls are in place. Request ECHO or requisition payments. Submit reports as required, milestone/progress; financial; and DBE, other special reports. Update excess Property Utilization Plan. Possible FTA on-site inspections. Prepare biennial inventories. Review third party contracts.|
|Budget revision. Grant amendments. Property disposition. Control sales and insurance proceeds.|
|Single annual audit occurs. Audit of third-party contracts occurs. FTA triennial review for 5307 grantees occurs.|
|Submit final reports. Final financial settlement. Grant close-out occurs.|
Top of Page
|ECHO Control Number (ECN)________________||(For initial ECHO setup agency will assign ECN Number, for non ECHO payments enter "N/A").|
Initial Setup ?
Info. Change ?
Grantee Information Change ?
Information from this form is required under the provision of 31 U.S.C. 3322 and 31 CFR 210. Treasury uses this to transmit payment data by electronic means to a company's or a grantee's financial institution. Failure to provide the requested information may delay or prevent the receipt of payments through the Treasury ACH Payment System.
Note: See back for instructions on completing this form.
|Contact Person Name:|
|Signature of Authorized Official in FTA||Telefax Number:
|Date: / /|
|Name: Federal Transit Administration|
|Address: 400 7th Street SW, Room 9422, TBP-24, Washington, D.C. 20590|
|Contact Person Name:||(202) 366-9748|
(Note: Have Your Bank Complete This Section)
|Contact Person Name:||Telephone Number:
|Nine Digit Routing Transit Number: __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __|
|Depositor Account Title:|
|Depositors Account Number:|
|Type of Account: Checking Saving|
|Signature and Title of Representative:||Date:
Top of Page
(Signature of Authorizing)
This to certify that the above is the signature of
|(Name of Recipient Organization)||(Tax Identification Number)|
And that they are duly authorized to approve payment requests submitted to the Federal Transit Administration on the behalf of________________________(your organization). This (does/does not) supersede previous signatory authorization for this ECHO Control Number.
In addition,______________________________(Name of Contact Person) is authorized to receive and maintain the ECHO Password.
|(Signature of Contact Person)|
|(Signature of Recipient Organization Official)|
|(Typed Name and Title)||(Date)|
|(Signature of Witness)|
Top of Page
INTRODUCTION. This appendix contains guidelines for undertaking joint development projects. It also contains a set of questions most frequently asked about the concept of joint development and provides responses to those questions, with examples. This appendix implements the joint development policy announced in the Federal Register on March 14, 1997, which is available at www.fta.dot.gov on the FTA Home Page.
JOINT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. Joint development is any income-producing activity with a transit nexus related to a real estate asset in which FTA has an interest or obtains one as a result of granting funds (the "Assisted Real Estate Asset"). Joint development projects must meet three tests: statutory definition, financial return, and highest and best transit use, discussed below.
Joint development projects are commercial, residential, industrial, or mixed-use developments that are induced by or enhance the effectiveness of transit projects. Joint development projects include private, for-profit, and non-profit development activities usually associated with fixed guideway transit systems that are new or being modernized or extended. Such projects can also be associated with new intermodal transfer facilities, transit malls, and Federal, state, or local investments in existing transit facilities. FTA capital funds may be used to facilitate private development that enhances transit; these funds may not be used for purely private development such as construction and permanent financing costs related to the design or construction of residential, retail, or other commercial, public, and private revenue-producing facilities not associated with transit-related development.
REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO STATUTORY DEFINITION. A joint development transportation project must be compatible with the statutory definition of a capital project:
It is a transportation project that enhances economic development or incorporates private investment including commercial and residential development, pedestrian and bicycle access to a mass transportation facility, and the renovation and improvement of historic transportation facilities, because the project:
OTHER DEFINITIONS RELATED TO THE CAPITAL PROJECT DEFINITION.
Physically Related. A project is physically related to a capital project if it provides a direct physical connection with transit services or facilities. This includes projects using air rights over transit stations or projects built within or adjacent to transit facilities.
Functionally Related. A project is functionally related to a capital project if it is related by activity and use, and it is functionally linked (with or without a direct physical connection) to transit services or facilities. Also, a project is functionally related to a capital project if it provides a beneficial service to the public (or community service) and enhances use of or access to transit. Functional relationships do not extend beyond the distance most people reasonably can be expected to walk to use a transit service. The eligible project area for a functionally related project is estimated to be within a radius of approximately 1,500 feet from the center of a transit facility. The eligible project area for a functionally related project will be identified by the grantee in consultation with FTA's Regional Office on a case-by-case basis.
FINANCIAL RETURN REQUIREMENTS.
Each grantee must negotiate a fair and equitable return in the form of cash and other benefits to be generated as a result of the FTA investment.
All projects must generate a one-time payment or ongoing revenue stream for transit use, the present value of which equals or exceeds the fair market value of the property. See paragraph 6 for discussion of fair market value.
After October 1, 1996, all FTA Master Agreements allow the use of real property for appropriate project purposes "including joint development purposes that generate program income to support transit purposes;" this is the Federal agency authorization required by 49 C.F.R. 18.25(g)(2) by which the revenues are brought within the definition of program income and can be used for transit capital, planning, and operating purposes. While a grant is still open, the transit agency must apply all revenues from any sale of real property (which does not qualify as a joint development transfer) to the grant purposes, or must return the revenues to FTA, or must obtain FTA approval to use the revenue to reduce gross project costs in another capital project. (See Chapter I, Sales Proceeds.) If the transit agency transfers an Assisted Real Estate Asset from an open grant and maintains continuing control and otherwise meets the three joint development program tests, the transit agency may retain as program income all the revenues that accrue.
For open grants predating October 1, 1996, all the terms of the current Master Agreement apply, so subparagraph c above controls.
Closed grants made in 1983 or thereafter may be reopened to allow for the use of Assisted Real Estate Assets in joint development projects. However, for those closed grants made between 1983 and October 1, 1996, the grant purpose and terms, as necessary, must be amended to allow for joint development. Aside from the requirement that the income be used for transit operating or capital expenses, FTA generally sets no further conditions on income from a closed grant.
Program income includes current or future returns generated from, but not limited to, transfer or lease of property, mortgage proceeds, or returns stemming from participation in distribution of project revenues.
Agreements which transfer title or rights in land or facilities acquired as part of the FTA project must contain provisions which--
HIGHEST AND BEST TRANSIT USE REQUIREMENT.
The calculation of equitable return required in paragraph 5 must be based on the appraised market value as represented either by highest and best use of the property or by highest and best transit use of the property, taking into account in either valuation the local transportation, land use, and economic development plans. Highest and best transit use is that combination of residential, commercial, retail, public, and/or parking space and amenities to be included in the joint development, which is calculated to produce the greatest level of social, economic, and financial benefit to the transit system and the community that it serves.
If the grantee structures a joint development project to include the transfer of an Assisted Real Estate Asset, then the final transfer value must be based on competition to the extent practicable, and FTA concurrence in the final transfer value is required.
ELIGIBLE COSTS FOR JOINT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. Eligible project costs for joint development projects include, but are not limited to, the following:
Planning, design, engineering, and environmental analyses, as appropriate. (Formula program funds are more appropriate for planning and feasibility analysis.)
Real estate packaging for a specific joint development project including preliminary design and engineering; estimates of operating income and expenses and capital costs; and negotiations to secure financing, developers, and prime tenants.
Land acquisition, relocation, demolition of existing improvements, and site preparation, as appropriate.
Foundations and substructure improvements for buildings over transit facilities.
Open space, and pedestrian connections and access links between transit services and related development.
Other facilities and infrastructure investments needed to induce significant private investment and to improve access between new or existing development and transit facilities.
Utility work. The eligibility of costs of utility work associated with private investment will be considered on a case-by-case basis. FTA grant funds will pay for costs of utility work that are attributable to non-FTA project purposes only when--
Safety and security equipment and facilities (including lighting, surveillance and related intelligent transportation system applications).
Facilities that incorporate community services such as daycare or health care.
Parking elements. All FTA participation in financing parking improvements must have a public transit justification and use. Parking elements of joint development projects which meet this general rule will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Professional Services Contracting Costs. Grantees may incur reasonable and necessary costs for consultants to prepare or perform items a through j above, or to assist the grantee in reviewing the same.
FUNDS THAT MAY BE USED IN JOINT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. No dedicated funding has been established for joint development projects. Joint development activities are eligible for funding under all Title 49 capital programs, including the Capital Program (Section 5309), the Urbanized Area Formula Program (Section 5307), the Non-urbanized Area Formula Program (Section 5311), and the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Program (Section 5310). CMAQ and STP funds transferred from the Federal Highway Administration to be administered by FTA may also be used to support joint development projects.
APPLICATION OF OTHER FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS TO PRIVATE SECTOR PROJECTS. In a joint development project, FTA must determine whether, and to what degree, various Federal rules apply to the privately funded, non-transit portion of the project. The applicability of Federal requirements (such as those of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Davis-Bacon Act, third party procurement requirements, and Buy America) will be resolved on a case-by-case basis for joint development projects involving the transfer of real property. FTA will work with the grant applicant to determine whether, and the extent to which, such Federal requirements apply, particularly to any private development, and the most appropriate procedures for satisfying the requirements. Proposals should be submitted as early as possible in the joint development process. This will allow FTA staff to help the grantee structure an approvable proposal in the least time possible and determine which cross-cutting requirements must be applied to the particular project. Nevertheless, the following cross-cutting requirements are expected to apply in the indicated circumstances:
If the joint development involves a ground lease or transfer of federally assisted real estate and there is no Federal assistance for new improvements, then the following requirements apply to the lessee or transferee and must be incorporated into the lease or the conveyance instrument:
If the construction of improvements is also federally assisted, then in addition to paragraph 9a above, at least the following requirements also will apply and must be incorporated into the lease or the conveyance instrument:
In any instance in which FTA determines that NEPA applies to the joint development, the level of environmental analysis will depend upon the complexity of the project and its likely impacts. In some instances, minimal review will be necessary, in which case FTA will issue a Categorical Exclusion. Joint development activities that portend significant environmental impacts, however, will necessitate the preparation of an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement. See generally the FTA Environmental Impact and Related Procedures at 23 C.F.R. Part 771.
NOTES TO READER. Before undertaking a new joint development, a grant applicant is encouraged to turn to Chapter X, "Regional Offices," of Circular 9300.1C, select the FTA Regional Office responsible for the grant applicant's locality, and telephone that office to discuss the kind of project planned. Such a dialogue, early in the project planning process, will ensure that the joint development proposal will be reviewed on a timely basis.
The statements included in this appendix reflect typical project situations. Instructions given and policy statements appearing in the circular are not intended to be read as inflexible FTA mandates. They are instead set forth as guidelines which FTA generally applies to typical projects. Early dialogue with the FTA Regional Office will clarify the degree to which a new joint development project conforms to, or differs from, previous FTA experience.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND SOME PRACTICAL EXAMPLES.
What is joint development? It is an income-producing activity involving a third party, taking place on or with an Assisted Real Estate Asset (described in paragraph 2 above). The third party is the source of the income to the grantee; the third party is the party to whom the property is transferred or the lessee who leases the space.
What is the limitation on new improvements for joint development? The purpose of the Joint Development Policy is to facilitate the use of an Assisted Real Estate Asset for transit oriented joint development. Thus, FTA will support, or allow the use of grant funds for, the construction of a structure that includes a transit facility. However, FTA is unlikely to allow FTA grant funds to support a free-standing facility (such as an apartment building or an office tower) that is not part of a transit facility. (See question 11f for the definition of a shell for joint development.)
Does joint development require a private or nonprofit developer? Not really. The third party's role need not be that of developer; it may be that of a lessee. For example, the transit agency can lease out its excess space to a senior care or day care provider, in which case the transit agency is the "developer" under FTA's policy. If, however, the project is to build an office/retail complex in the air space above a transit station, only a very large transit agency will have the means to borrow the sums necessary to build and finance the structure. It will be much easier (though not absolutely necessary) to have a private partner who builds and manages the development.
One transit authority has created a private subsidiary (limited partnership) to assist it in developing property around an historic central station. This project will create six floors of multi-family rental housing. The project will be financed with a combination of historic preservation tax credits, low-income housing tax credits, and mortgage revenue bonds issued by the city. The transit operator is also a partner in the joint development. The transit operator will receive a share of the project revenues for the life of the limited partnership.
What is highest and best transit use? A property's highest and best use is the use--from among reasonably probable and legal alternative uses that are physically possible, appropriately supported, and financially feasible--that results in the highest anticipated selling price. The way highest and best transit use differs from highest and best use is through recognition that value to the transit system is not in the selling price alone.
Highest and best transit use is that combination of financial return and other transit benefits, such as increasing ridership, reducing trip durations or improving connections between trips, that maximizes the value of the asset to transit.
For example, a transit agency identified several properties adjoining existing or planned transit stations that it wished to use for joint development. One particular property was oddly shaped, but with substantial road frontage. A request for development proposals resulted in offers to build 8 or 10 townhouses with garages. This option would produce the highest immediate cash proceeds to the transit system. However, the transit agency sought and was granted revised zoning on the property, allowing up to 160 moderate income apartments to be offered for rent. The moderate-income rental use will take a long time to produce cash flow and proceeds to the grantee, but in the interim, the moderate-income rental use is projected to increase transit ridership by (conservatively) 32,000 trips per year, which are estimated to be worth between $18,000 and $24,000 per year in additional farebox revenues. It is anticipated that these residents will also provide economic support for new retail space in the surrounding community. FTA regards this decision as satisfying the "highest and best transit use" criterion.
How much land may be purchased by a grantee? A town is currently planning improvements to its bus transit system, including a downtown transfer center. The center is being planned as a multi-use facility, which will include a tourist information center, small retail businesses, and possibly a bank. To make this eventual development a reality may require that the transit agency acquire a larger amount of land than is necessary for the transit center alone. FTA will assist the transit operator's land acquisition activities with grant funds, as described in paragraphs 7a through 7e of this appendix. Generally, FTA will not support land purchases more than 1,500 feet from the center of the transit facility.
What is an "envelope" or "building shell" for a joint development? The transit agency may wish to encourage local economic activity at its facilities. Under the Joint Development policy, the transit agency may build an "envelope," or rehabilitate an existing transit owned facility. Envelope or building shell means (but is not limited to) load bearing walls, roof, foundation, substructure improvement, site design, and engineering. "Tenant finishes," however, are not eligible for FTA reimbursement. These include partition walls, furniture, equipment, shelving, lighting, drapes, floor coverings, and other items specific to the business intended to be operated.
A Neighborhood Travel and Jobs Center involved just such a development. There, the local transit authority was allowed to convert an existing office building into a $3 million Neighborhood Travel Center. The center will serve as a terminal for bus lines to industrial jobs and will provide the focus for a downtown redevelopment "campus" including jobs training, child care facilities, and a privately-financed development bank. The tenant finishes for each of these ancillary activities will be paid for with non-grant funds, though grant funds were used to rehabilitate the building itself. The tenants will pay market rate rent to the transit authority.
What is the difference between a sale and a joint development transfer? A sale does not involve continuing control of the real property by the grantee and fails to establish a nexus between the Assisted Real Estate Asset and an ongoing transit purpose as outlined in paragraph 3 of this appendix. Proceeds from a sale are not program income and must be returned to FTA pursuant to 49 CFR 18.31(c)(2).
In contrast, a joint development transfer meets the statutory definition test outlined in paragraph 3 of this appendix, the grantee exercises continuing control over the transferred real estate, and the financial and highest and best use tests of the Joint Development Policy are met. The proceeds from a joint development transfer are considered program income, which may be retained by the grantee. (See paragraph 5c.)
Here is an example of a joint development transfer: a rapid rail station includes 6.3 acres for a "park and ride" area. A developer has been approved to build 160 residential units and 17,000 square feet of service retail space on a portion of this area. The transit operator transfers 3.4 acres to the developer for use in the joint development. The development will generate more transit trips and more non-fare revenue than the displaced parking spaces provided. The transit agency will retain the income generated from this land transfer as program income and will be assured of satisfactory continuing control through covenants running with the land. Should the developer re-sell the land in the future, the covenants bind the next owner to a transit-oriented use of the land.
Will NEPA and other Federal cross-cutting requirements discourage private participation? It is the will of the Congress that the Federal cross-cutting requirements govern grantees' use of FTA's financial assistance. To the extent that a grantee joins with a private or nonprofit developer to undertake joint development using FTA grant funds in whole or in part for the improvements to the site, it is that grantee's role to obtain the grant funds necessary to make the joint development financially feasible and to supply its expertise in meeting the applicable Federal requirements. For example, if the proposed land use is known from the outset, a grantee can reduce the risk to the private or nonprofit developer by using transit resources to perform the necessary environmental studies before choosing a partner. Alternatively, a project may be structured so that the grantee selects a development partner, the grantee and the partner jointly determine the highest and best transit use, and the grantee then performs the necessary environmental studies before its private or nonprofit partner becomes responsible for any costs. Such incentives can attract new participants to transit joint development.
Are all incidental uses joint development? No, not all incidental uses are joint development. ( FTA permits the incidental use of transit equipment and property for purposes other than provision of transit service, provided the use is compatible with the approved purposes of the project and does not interfere with intended uses of project assets.) Allowing nearby theaters and restaurants to use transit parking spaces during the transit system's off hours is an incidental use. So is temporary use of transit property as a staging area for nearby construction. These uses, however, are not joint development. In contrast, the acquisition of land or the redesign of space to allow for additional parking to be used by local theaters and restaurants could be considered as a joint development project -- to the extent the acquisition or redesign is justified by a transit use -- and should be discussed with the Regional Office.
What is the difference between "joint development" and "transit-oriented development?" The term "joint development" is a subset of transit-oriented development. While all joint development is transit-oriented development, not all transit-oriented development meets the three tests of statutory definition (transit nexus), financial return, and highest and best transit use. Some transit-oriented development undertaken by private parties benefits from its proximity to transit without the use of an Assisted Real Estate Asset and/or without the use of FTA funds for new improvements. Such totally private projects are simply not governed by this circular.
Top of Page