FTA Logo
Skip Navigation

Last Updated: January 09, 2008

Site Map | Web Accessibility | FAQs | United We Ride | Contact Us
About FTA
News & Events
Planning & Environment
Grants & Financing
Legislation, Regulations & Guidance
Research, Technical Assistance & Training
Civil Rights & Accessibility
Reports & Publications
Safety & Security
Regional Offices Regional Map of United States
Click on the Region to view each page.
You are here:Home |Grants & Financing |Third Party Procurement |Frequently Asked Questions: Third Party Procurement | Alternate Bids

Alternate Bids


Q. Our Agency is preparing bid documents to purchase 43 Sport Utility Vehicles. The Operations Group has requested that they would like to bid the requirement for 2 variations of the vehicles; they would like the firms to price out the vehicles in 2 ways: 1 bid for a standard SUV and 1 bid for a Hybrid Version. The award would be for the lowest bid for either the standard SUV or the Hybrid version. Is there a problem with this bidding structure?

A. There is no fundamental problem with soliciting bids for both standard and hybrid vehicles, as long as you clearly inform the bidders of your intentions, being clear to leave as much flexibility as possible in making the award.  For example, you may want to state it will be all standard or all hybrids, depending on the prices received in relation to the available budget. Or you may wish to say that the Agency may chose a combination of vehicle types, in which case you may want to solicit bids for varying quantities (e.g., 15-25, 25-43, etc.).
 



Submit a Question or Suggestion/Issue
Submit a Technical Issue on this page
Home | Related Links | FOIA | DOT.gov | WhiteHouse.gov | USA.gov | OIG Hotline | Regulations.gov | FTA Web Policies | Privacy Policy | No FEAR
Adobe Acrobat Reader | MS Word Viewer | MS Excel Viewer | MS PowerPoint Viewer
Region I Region II Region III Region IV Region V Region VII Region VI Region VIII Region IX Region X Region X Region IX LMRO