|
TABLE 23 FY 2002 URBANIZED AREA FORMULA OBLIGATIONS FOR RAIL ROLLING STOCK PURCHASES AND REHABILITATION
RAIL ROLLING STOCK PURCHASES
| Area |
Rapid Rail # |
Rapid Rail $ |
Light Rail # |
Light Rail $ |
Comm. Self-Prop. # |
Comm. Self-Prop. $ |
Comm. Trailer # |
Comm. Trailer $ |
Locomotive # |
Locomotive $ |
Diesel Self-Prop # |
Diesel Self-Prop $ |
Used Rail Car # |
Used Rail Car $ |
Other |
Total Purchases # |
Total Purchases $ |
Percent of Total |
| Chicago, IL-IN |
|
|
|
|
10 |
2,250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
$2,250,000 |
1.2 |
| Denver, CO |
|
|
1 |
779,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
779,000 |
0.4 |
| Memphis, TN-AR-MS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,000 |
0 |
96,000 |
0.1 |
| New York-NENJ (NY) |
160 |
179,592,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
179,592,622 |
94.2 |
| Pittsburgh, PA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400,000) |
0 |
-400,000 |
(0.2) |
| Portland-Vanc, OR-WA |
|
|
2 |
1,211,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
1,211,355 |
0.6 |
| Salt Lake City, UT |
|
|
0 |
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
4,000,000 |
2.1 |
| San Juan, PR |
0 |
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
4,000,000 |
2.1 |
| Wash., DC-MD-VA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
(965,208) |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
-965,208 |
(0.5) |
| TOTAL |
160 |
$183,592,622 |
3 |
$5,990,355 |
10 |
$2,250,000 |
0 |
$0 |
0 |
($965,208) |
0 |
$0 |
0 |
$0 |
($304,000) |
173 |
$190,563,769 |
100.0 |
| Percent of Total |
|
96.3 |
|
3.1 |
|
1.2 |
|
0.0 |
|
(0.5) |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
(0.2) |
|
100.0 |
|
NOTE: Includes both Fixed Guideway and New Starts. The obligations in Other are for spare parts / associated capital maintenance. Negative obligations indicate budget revisions to grant amendments.
RAIL ROLLING STOCK REHABILITATION
| Area |
Rapid Rail $ |
Light Rail $ |
Comm. Self-Prop. $ |
Comm. Trailer $ |
Locomotive $ |
Diesel Self-Prop $ |
Used Rail Car $ |
Other $ |
Total Rehab $ |
Percent of Total |
| Baltimore, MD |
1,674,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,674,322 |
3.5 |
| Chattanooga, TN-GA |
|
|
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
24,000 |
0.0 |
| Chicago, IL-IN |
4,588,132 |
|
420,000 |
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
5,608,132 |
11.6 |
| Connecticut |
|
|
15,560,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
15,560,091 |
32.3 |
| Detroit, MI |
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
0.2 |
| Riverside-San Brndno, CA |
|
|
|
|
144,417 |
|
|
|
144,417 |
0.3 |
| Salt Lake City, UT |
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,000 |
0.3 |
| San Diego, CA |
|
|
|
|
1,211,587 |
|
|
1,405,742 |
2,617,329 |
5.4 |
| San Francisco-Oklnd, CA |
11,805,000 |
|
|
1,666,000 |
|
|
1,106,000 |
|
14,577,000 |
30.2 |
| San Jose, CA |
|
|
|
1,334,000 |
|
|
|
|
1,334,000 |
2.8 |
| Wash., DC-MD-VA |
6,486,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,486,462 |
13.4 |
| TOTAL |
$24,553,916 |
$205,000 |
$15,980,091 |
$3,000,000 |
$1,956,004 |
$24,000 |
$1,106,000 |
$1,405,742 |
$48,230,753 |
100.0 |
| Percent of Total |
50.9 |
0.4 |
33.1 |
6.2 |
4.1 |
0.0 |
2.3 |
2.9 |
100.0 |
|
NOTE: If quantity = 0 for vehicle purchase, funds are supplemental to a previous purchase.
|