Flexible Funding - Comparison of Flexible Fund Obligations by Purpose for UZA's >1M (FY 1992-2001)

Printer Friendly Version


Table 92
COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE FUND OBLIGATIONS BY PURPOSE FOR UZAs GREATER THAN 1 MILLION POPULATION
Includes All FTA programs and Flexible Fund Types
FY 1992 through FY 2001


UZA Motor_veh Equip Pssngr_fac Veh_fac Parking_fac New_serv Program Rail_vehs Rail_line Busway Other Total
  $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ %
ATLANTA, GA 46,168,671 45.3 9,196,616 9.0 20,009,632 19.6 14,400,000 14.1 6,282,129 6.2 3,934,021 3.9 600,000 0.6 0 0.0 52,000 0.1 0 0.0 1,370,752 1.3 102,013,821 1.7
BALTIMORE, MD 4,883,524 8.6 69,476 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1,232,000 2.2 0 0.0 3,081,052 5.4 36,352,757 64.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 11,024,191 19.5 56,643,000 1.0
BOSTON, MA 1,070,676 0.6 31,616 0.0 45,168,764 26.7 0 0.0 23,597,628 13.9 1,662,133 1.0 828,700 0.5 0 0.0 95,820,000 56.6 0 0.0 1,207,936 0.7 169,387,453 2.9
CHICAGO, IL-IN 49,859,400 18.9 3,118,750 1.2 89,956,240 34.2 9,304,520 3.5 21,517,019 8.2 13,969,570 5.3 460,696 0.2 9,250,000 3.5 51,134,180 19.4 0 0.0 14,629,200 5.6 263,199,575 4.4
CINCINNATI,OH-KY 19,795,600 42.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 7,031,937 15.1 130,000 0.3 6,287,550 13.5 0 0.0 10,695,000 23.0 0 0.0 2,539,139 5.5 46,479,226 0.8
CLEVELAND, OH 28,227,200 48.6 0 0.0 14,588,000 25.1 4,764,800 8.2 6,180,000 10.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1,900,000 3.3 2,423,484 4.2 58,083,484 1.0
DALLAS-FT. WORTH, TX 18,287,250 16.9 5,818,162 5.4 27,237,443 25.1 0 0.0 862,400 0.8 0 0.0 11,536,443 10.6 5,445,000 5.0 27,540,001 25.4 0 0.0 11,605,359 10.7 108,332,058 1.8
DENVER, CO 3,756,000 8.2 610,000 1.3 6,000,000 13.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1,800,000 3.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 31,621,000 69.1 0 0.0 2,000,000 4.4 45,787,000 0.8
DETROIT, MI 40,010,101 63.6 1,883,688 3.0 2,788,763 4.4 4,960,000 7.9 0 0.0 12,859,831 20.4 300,000 0.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 108,790 0.2 62,911,173 1.1
FT. LAUD-HLLYWD-POMP BCH, FL 0 0.0 0 0.0 2,066,000 18.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 9,000,000 81.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 11,066,000 0.2
HOUSTON, TX 0 0.0 8,193,120 22.2 0 0.0 1,200,000 3.3 488,000 1.3 26,606,623 72.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 336,480 0.9 36,824,223 0.6
KANSAS CITY, KS-MO 401,249 2.3 0 0.0 6,418,878 37.2 475,000 2.8 975,000 5.7 6,263,306 36.3 588,960 3.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2,115,000 12.3 17,237,393 0.3
LOS ANGELES, CA 442,033,400 36.8 2,617,026 0.2 38,240,000 3.2 89,355,876 7.4 1,313,000 0.1 67,100,000 5.6 54,100,000 4.5 117,377,000 9.8 353,898,361 29.5 0 0.0 34,716,637 2.9 1,200,751,300 20.2
MIAMI-HIALEAH, FL 0 0.0 0 0.0 15,992,856 33.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 2,351,362 4.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 24,714,928 51.7 4,712,800 9.9 47,771,946 0.8
MILWAUKEE, WI 3,624,000 20.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 11,533,006 63.9 535,630 3.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2,351,239 13.0 18,043,875 0.3
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL, MN 11,552,428 15.4 7,993,600 10.7 7,351,467 9.8 0 0.0 578,652 0.8 13,780,299 18.4 1,600,000 2.1 0 0.0 17,000,000 22.7 0 0.0 15,065,453 20.1 74,921,899 1.3
NEW ORLEANS, LA 6,839,288 67.1 25,168 0.2 3,200,000 31.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 135,544 1.3 10,200,000 0.2
NEW YORK, NY-NORTHEASTERN NJ 91,308,307 6.8 23,381,280 1.7 396,314,008 29.5 87,023,988 6.5 10,248,070 0.8 38,853,871 2.9 0 0.0 75,425,000 5.6 584,732,582 43.6 0 0.0 34,380,589 2.6 1,341,667,695 22.6
NORFOLK-VA BCH-NWPT NWS, VA 24,726,640 40.5 3,196,000 5.2 2,982,400 4.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 9,522,656 15.6 2,880,440 4.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 17,745,600 29.1 61,053,736 1.0
PHILADELPHIA, PA-NJ 70,157,738 28.5 3,004,336 1.2 39,760,774 16.1 632,000 0.3 7,936,928 3.2 4,080,619 1.7 418,000 0.2 85,562,079 34.7 33,197,255 13.5 0 0.0 1,699,128 0.7 246,448,857 4.1
PHOENIX, AZ 57,828,727 80.4 654,954 0.9 3,130,505 4.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 10,281,960 14.3 71,896,146 1.2
PITTSBURGH, PA 2,791,520 1.7 18,380 0.0 222,000 0.1 130,000 0.1 4,462,200 2.8 14,776,000 9.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 7,514,536 4.7 124,465,606 77.8 5,595,764 3.5 159,976,006 2.7
PORTLAND-VANCOUVER, OR-WA 50,300,610 36.0 5,935,835 4.2 1,719,000 1.2 1,273,310 0.9 2,480,061 1.8 777,489 0.6 3,630,573 2.6 915,246 0.7 59,224,999 42.4 0 0.0 13,473,849 9.6 139,730,972 2.4
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO, CA 14,043,337 96.0 101,801 0.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 480,000 3.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 14,625,138 0.2
SACRAMENTO, CA 14,233,333 7.7 1,116,237 0.6 9,681,006 5.2 4,150,640 2.2 0 0.0 3,552,501 1.9 88,000 0.0 0 0.0 146,412,509 79.1 0 0.0 5,814,678 3.1 185,048,904 3.1
SAN DIEGO, CA 60,215,209 63.9 1,288,000 1.4 5,789,000 6.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 9,734,783 10.3 1,500,000 1.6 1,673,000 1.8 10,027,766 10.6 0 0.0 3,969,000 4.2 94,196,758 1.6
SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND, CA 59,151,729 13.4 38,946,185 8.8 25,083,890 5.7 22,065,130 5.0 1,200,000 0.3 6,567,000 1.5 0 0.0 127,216,000 28.9 98,886,257 22.4 0 0.0 61,509,940 14.0 440,626,131 7.4
SAN JOSE, CA 11,176,000 5.1 5,820,000 2.7 1,253,000 0.6 4,844,000 2.2 1,280,000 0.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 193,190,446 88.6 0 0.0 500,000 0.2 218,063,446 3.7
SAN JUAN, PR 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 179,888,749 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 179,888,749 3.0
SEATTLE, WA 13,622,354 8.7 8,813,000 5.6 20,117,000 12.8 740,000 0.5 1,453,000 0.9 10,860,384 6.9 10,051,000 6.4 53,898,174 34.2 10,274,826 6.5 0 0.0 27,569,440 17.5 157,399,178 2.6
ST. LOUIS, IL-MO 63,220,649 75.1 0 0.0 5,298,214 6.3 0 0.0 9,255,026 11.0 201,840 0.2 1,583,381 1.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4,676,696 5.6 84,235,806 1.4
TAMPA-ST. PETE-CLEARWATER, FL 32,268,006 64.1 1,445,794 2.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4,125,000 8.2 6,900,000 13.7 0 0.0 5,580,800 11.1 50,319,600 0.8
WASHINGTON, DC-MD-VA 82,473,178 49.8 1,162,600 0.7 15,400,000 9.3 0 0.0 4,508,000 2.7 3,714,000 2.2 700,000 0.4 1,880,000 1.1 50,671,347 30.6 0 0.0 4,980,000 3.0 165,489,125 2.8
TOTAL 1,324,026,124 22.3 134,441,624 2.3 805,768,840 13.6 245,319,264 4.1 112,881,050 1.9 265,111,294 4.5 100,770,425 1.7 519,119,256 8.7 1,977,681,814 33.3 151,080,534 2.5 304,119,448 5.1 5,940,319,673 100.0
NOTE: Usage information was obtained from FTA budget documents. Explanation for usage categories shown below Table 90.

A A A    Bookmark and Share