Table A-3: Land Use Assessment Ratings
Table A-3: Land Use Assessment Ratings
|
I. EXISTING LAND USE | ||
|---|---|---|
|
a. Existing Land Use | ||
|
Preliminary Engineering and Final Design |
HIGH |
Current levels of population, employment, and other trip generators in station areas are sufficient to support a major transit investment. Most station areas are pedestrian-friendly and fully accessible. |
|
MEDIUM |
Current levels of population, employment, and other trip generators in station areas marginally support a major transit investment. Some station areas are pedestrian-friendly and accessible. Significant growth must be realized. | |
|
LOW |
Current levels of population, employment, and other trip generators in station areas are inadequate to support a major transit investment. Station areas are not pedestrian-friendly. | |
|
Ratings based on assessment of the following:
| ||
|
II. TRANSIT-SUPPORTIVE PLANS AND POLICIES | ||
|
a. Growth Management | ||
|
Preliminary Engineering and Final Design |
HIGH |
Adopted and enforceable growth management and land conservation policies are in place throughout the region. Existing and planned densities and market trends in the region and corridor are strongly compatible with transit. |
|
MEDIUM |
Significant progress has been made toward implementing growth management and land conservation policies. Strong policies may be adopted in some jurisdictions but not others, or only moderately enforceable policies (e.g., incentive-based) may be adopted regionwide. Existing and/or planned densities and market trends are moderately compatible with transit. | |
|
LOW |
Limited consideration has been given to implementing growth management and land conservation policies; adopted policies may be weak and apply to only a limited area. Existing and/or planned densities and market trends are minimally or not supportive of transit. | |
|
Ratings based on assessment of the following:
| ||
|
b. Transit Supportive Corridor Policies | ||
|
Final Design |
HIGH |
Conceptual plans for the corridor and station areas have been developed. Local jurisdictions have adopted or drafted revisions to comprehensive and/or small area plans in most or all station areas. Land use patterns proposed in conceptual plans and local and institutional plan revisions are strongly supportive of a major transit investment. |
|
MEDIUM |
Conceptual plans for the corridor and station areas have been developed. Local jurisdictions have initiated the process of revising comprehensive and/or small area plans. Land use patterns proposed in conceptual plans and local and institutional plan revisions are at least moderately supportive of a major transit investment. | |
|
LOW |
Limited progress, to date, has been made toward developing station area conceptual plans or revising local comprehensive or small area plans. Existing station area land uses identified in local comprehensive plans are marginally or not transit-supportive. | |
|
Preliminary Engineering |
HIGH |
Conceptual plans for the corridor and station areas have been developed. Discussions have been undertaken with local jurisdictions about revising comprehensive plans. Land use patterns proposed in conceptual plans for station areas (or in existing comprehensive plans and institutional master plans throughout the corridor) are strongly supportive of a major transit investment. |
|
MEDIUM |
Conceptual plans for the corridor and station areas are being developed. Discussions have been undertaken with local jurisdictions about revising comprehensive plans. Land use patterns proposed in conceptual plans for station areas (or existing in local comprehensive plans and institutional master plans) are at least moderately supportive of a major transit investment. | |
|
LOW |
Limited progress, to date, has been made toward developing station area conceptual plans or working with local jurisdictions to revise comprehensive plans. Existing station area land uses identified in local comprehensive plans are marginally or not transit-supportive. | |
|
Ratings based on assessment of the following:
| ||
|
c. Supportive Zoning Regulations Near Transit Stations | ||
|
Final Design |
HIGH |
Local jurisdictions have adopted zoning changes that strongly support a major transit investment in most or all transit station areas. |
|
MEDIUM |
Local jurisdictions are in the process of adopting zoning changes that moderately or strongly support a major transit investment in most or all transit station areas. Alternatively: strongly transit-supportive zoning has been adopted in some station areas but not in others. | |
|
LOW |
No more than initial efforts have begun to prepare station area plans and related zoning. Existing station area zoning is marginally or not transit-supportive. | |
|
Preliminary Engineering |
HIGH |
A conceptual planning process is underway to recommend zoning changes for station areas. Conceptual plans and policies for station areas are recommending transit-supportive densities and design characteristics. Local jurisdictions have committed to examining and changing zoning regulations where necessary. Alternatively, a “high” rating can be assigned if existing zoning in most or all transit station areas is already strongly transit-supportive. |
|
MEDIUM |
A conceptual planning process is underway to recommend zoning changes for station areas. Local jurisdictions are in the process of committing to examining and changing zoning regulations where necessary. Alternatively, a “medium” rating can be assigned if existing zoning in most or all transit station areas is already moderately transit-supportive. | |
|
LOW |
Limited consideration has been given to preparing station area plans and related zoning. Existing station area zoning is marginally or not transit-supportive. | |
|
Ratings based on assessment of the following:
| ||
|
d. Tools to Implement Land Use Policies | ||
|
Final Design |
HIGH |
Transit agencies and/or regional agencies are working proactively with local jurisdictions, developers, and the public to promote transit-supportive land use planning and station area development. The transit agency has established a joint development program and identified development opportunities. Agencies have adopted effective regulatory and financial incentives to promote transit-oriented development. Public and private capital improvements are being programmed in the corridor and station areas which implement the local land use policies and which leverage the Federal investment in the proposed corridor. |
|
MEDIUM |
Transit agencies and/or regional agencies have conducted some outreach to promote transit-supportive land use planning and station area development. Regulatory and financial incentives to promote transit-oriented development are being developed, or have been adopted but are only moderately effective. Capital improvements are being identified that support station area land use plans and leverage the Federal investment in the proposed major transit corridor. | |
|
LOW |
Limited effort has been made to reach out to jurisdictions, developers, or the public to promote transit-supportive land use planning; to identify regulatory and financial incentives to promote development; or to identify capital improvements. | |
|
Preliminary Engineering |
HIGH |
Transit agencies and/or regional agencies are working proactively with local jurisdictions, developers, and the public to promote transit-supportive land use planning and station area development. Local agencies are making recommendations for effective regulatory and financial incentives to promote transit-oriented development. Capital improvement programs are being developed that support station area land use plans and leverage the Federal investment in the proposed major transit corridor. |
|
MEDIUM |
Transit agencies and/or regional agencies have conducted some outreach to promote transit-supportive land use planning and station area development. Agencies are investigating regulatory and financial incentives to promote transit-oriented development. Capital improvements are being identified that support station area land use plans and leverage the Federal investment in the proposed major transit corridor. | |
|
LOW |
Limited effort has been made to reach out to jurisdictions, developers, or the public to promote transit-supportive land use planning; to identify regulatory and financial incentives to promote development; or to identify capital improvements. | |
|
Ratings based on assessment of the following:
| ||
|
III. PERFORMANCE AND IMPACTS OF LAND USE POLICIES | ||
|
a. Performance of Land Use Policies | ||
|
Final Design |
HIGH |
A significant number of development proposals are being received for transit-supportive housing and employment in station areas. Significant amounts of transit-supportive development have occurred in other, existing transit corridors and station areas in the region. |
|
MEDIUM |
Some development proposals are being received for transit-supportive housing and employment in station areas. Moderate amounts of transit-supportive development have occurred in other existing transit corridors and station areas in the region. | |
|
LOW |
A limited number of proposals for transit-supportive housing and employment development in the corridor are being received. Other existing transit corridors and station areas in the region lack significant examples of transit-supportive housing and employment development. | |
|
Preliminary Engineering |
HIGH |
Transit-supportive housing and employment development is occurring in the corridor. Significant amounts of transit-supportive development have occurred in other, existing transit corridors and station areas in the region. |
|
MEDIUM |
Station locations have not been established with finality, and therefore, development would not be expected. Moderate amounts of transit-supportive housing and employment development have occurred in other, existing transit corridors and station areas in the region. | |
|
LOW |
Other existing transit corridors and station areas in the region lack significant examples of transit-supportive housing and employment development. | |
|
Ratings based on assessment of the following:
| ||
|
b. Potential Impact of Transit Project on Regional Land Use | ||
|
Preliminary Engineering and Final Design |
HIGH |
A significant amount of land in station areas is available for new development or redevelopment at transit-supportive densities. Local plans, policies, and development programs, as well as real estate market conditions, strongly support such development. |
|
MEDIUM |
A moderate amount of land in station areas is available for new development or redevelopment at transit-supportive densities. Local plans, policies, and development programs, as well as real estate market conditions, moderately support such development. | |
|
LOW |
Only a modest amount of land in station areas is available for new development or redevelopment. Local plans, policies, and development programs, as well as real estate market conditions, provide marginal support for new development in station areas. | |
|
Ratings based on assessment of the following:
| ||

